Heaven's Reply
First, thanks to A for letting Heaven post her "take" on this.
I saw Heaven once when she was at Julie's and she was excellent in session. Obviously, her strong point is in her work, and not in her logic.
First she responds to the assertion about her pimp/boyfriend by saying.....well, by saying nothing! She obliquely implies she does not have a pimp, but says nothing about whether or not there is a boyfriend and what happened with them. Thanks for the non-answer.
She does not at all address the earlier question on the board about whether she's really Julie's niece.
She then says that her former employer was making her "work too hard for little money." What a shame. Of course, that's GOOD for us hobbyists, isn't it? I'd never assert that anyone does NOT have the right to change jobs when they're unhappy, but don't MOST working folks feel they deserve to get paid more?
Then, she says, "So if anyone's the pimp in this whole thing it's Julie herself." I fail to see how any madam doesn't qualify as a pimp under this definition.
Now I get it....this whole thing is as clear as ..........mud!