Coyote Busted?

Zep51

Tastes like chicken
Coyote Girl Just A Few Things Here:
-First of all, it is good to see you back and posting
-Secondly, we all make errors in judgement at times. Yours may have been different, but we all make mistakes. Possibly-it is best to learn by our mistakes.
-Thirdly, yes Betty is correct, move the locations around. The community you reside in-is not the most filled with open ideas around.
-Lastly, probably the boring house-wives turned you in. You may have given their husbands something that they were unable or unwilling to give them. And by that I mean a good time and a smile on their face. Like their is something wrong with making people happy?

Good to see that you have a lawyer. Hang in there-Babe!
 
ironic, isn't it?

Originally posted by Sen. John Blutarsky Yeah, I guess you would prefer the shrew Hillary.
The original Blutarsky -- the character played by the late John Bulushi, and the late Bulushi himself -- both would have clearly preferred Hilary Clinton to John Ashcroft for any position of responsibility. Both would have found it entirely appropriate that Ashcroft couldn't even beat a dead man in an election in Missouri.
 
hitler = socialist ????

Originally posted by wartboy Yes, I am lumping FDR, Hitler and the Clintons into one specific category. They are/were all socialist. That does not mean that they embraced one another's ideology exactly. But they all
believe(d) that the power of the state is paramount. ...
I think your definitions are a little "off." Not everyone who believes "the power of the state is paramount" is appropriately called a "socialist." hitler, was, in fact, primarily a facist, not a socialist. The fact that he named his party "national socialism" just means he knew how to manipulate the public with the big lie.

It seems to me more likely that you just are so disappointed that the normal knee-jerk insult term of "liberal," which applies to Hillary (but not Bill) Clinton and FDR just won't work for hitler. Face it: hitler was a product of (and a natural extension of) the politics of the far right.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by CoyoteGirlJosi
Believe me Im not a stupid girl, Im not saying that, but in this field, yes I am stupid...didnt know the safe ways to protect myself...
What happens next babe? The article mentioned someting about seeing the judge Sept 3rd.
 

Sen. John Blutarsky

On double secret probation
Re: ironic, isn't it?

Originally posted by donquixote04
The original Blutarsky -- the character played by the late John Bulushi, and the late Bulushi himself -- both would have clearly preferred Hilary Clinton to John Ashcroft for any position of responsibility. Both would have found it entirely appropriate that Ashcroft couldn't even beat a dead man in an election in Missouri.

And of course people never change their postions ove time.

One case, Sen. Robert Byrd from West Virgina. Currently a champion of civil rights, but in his youth a member of the KKK.
 
Last edited:
Re: hitler = socialist ????

Originally posted by donquixote04
It seems to me more likely that you just are so disappointed that the normal knee-jerk insult term of "liberal," which applies to Hillary (but not Bill) Clinton and FDR just won't work for hitler. Face it: hitler was a product of (and a natural extension of) the politics of the far right.
And Stalin was a product of (and a natural extension of) the politics of the far left. Your point is?

If it is that the prior posts which equated the Clintons and FDR to Hitler were absurd, you are, of course, correct. Only one mass murderer in that lot.

But if your point was that only the far right can produce a monster, well then, no, afraid not. Stalin's victims, like Hitler's, numbered in the tens of millions. And then we have lesser lights like Mao, Pol Pot, Kim Il Sung and son, who demonstrate clearly that the far right does not have a monopoly on mass murder in the name of the state.
 
Originally posted by CoyoteGirlJosi
Believe me Im not a stupid girl, Im not saying that, but in this field, yes I am stupid...didnt know the safe ways to protect myself...
Josi... Here is a check list with which to start.

Normally I wouldn't go into such things, but as I have always thought of you as quite genuine, and someone like myself; a free spirit* sort, who came to this because you love sex [and what better way to make a living then by doing something you love], let me run down some thoughts for you.

1) Get yourself a prepaid cellphone under an assumed name. Use ONLY calling cards purchased with cash to pay for the minutes for that phone. If at any time the phone number appears "hot", give the phone a good wipe and toss it in the trash. Then get yourself anyother phone with a different number.

2) Get yourself a secure e*m*a*i*l account with a company like 'Hush-Mail". Use only the free version. Never a paid account. You'd have to use a credit card and that is directly tracable back to you.

Access this account from your computer ONLY by means of an anonymous proxy server [so that no logs are created at the site of the web-based ****** client that show your personal IP address].

3) Do any business over that phone line and that e*m*a*i*l address ONLY.

4) Do incall based ONLY out of hotels. Vary them.

5) Make sure these hotels have sufficent traffic. People are wrong when they say they don't like to deal with intermediate and high traffic hotels. Hotels with minimal traffic allow all manner of folks to take note of the small amount of comings and goings. A high traffic hotel, when entrance and exit is made discreetly, is simply one more person coming or going. Nothing special of which to take note.

5) At the same time make sure that the hotel in question isn't one with "morality police officers". Some hotels consider themselves "family hotels". They train their people, specifically, to be on guard for traffic of an "adult" nature.

Hotels that advertise their family type atmospheres are chiefly among these. An Embassy Suites near an airport, tailored for business type traffic, would be a better choice then a Holiday Inn near a family resort area for instance. If you lack specific knowledge about how to tell the difference stick to hotels around airports and convention centers [like the ones in Edison, or Secaucus].

If you have to use motels, the "no-tell's" are the best. There business depends on short-stays and they make a point of NOT taking notice of comings and goings. But its hard to find one that is both totally discreet and provides a high level of service [ready access to clean towels and bedding, etc.]. It might be advisable to pack some of your own. This not only gives the tools you need to see folks in an atmosphere that promotes return business and makes you feel comfortable, but also provides for some luggage to carry in with you to make your stay appear more conventional.

6) Client screening: Maintain a reasonable level of client screening. You work from the boards, so to some degree you can work with that. Someone contacting you IRL, who drops a board name on you, should have some idea about the things you have discussed directly on the board. If not, assume it isn't that person. Referrals from other providers, known to you from your correspondence here and other contact.

Call back numbers [though this won't work with johns who use the same methodology I have described above for you, as providers aren't the only ones with throw away phones now-days].

You can request some form of real documentation prior to seeing someone but know that it will lead to: 1) either someone presenting to you phony ID, which is worse then useless for what you are trying to achieve; or 2) greatly deminish the number of clients who might call on you because johns, rightly or wrongly, don't like the idea of providers knowing their real telephone numbers, address, real names, etc. It makes some of them feel a tad too "naked", and therefore, vunerable.

So, ideally, a means that is both effective and as unobtrusive to the john as possible meets the need. As I have noted, the best of these is referrals from people who have already seen this man, and know him. Second best would be a double call back system where the person calls you from a payphone in view of your hotel window, where you can size him up before he knocks on your door. That, and the acquisition of a good antenna for BS are your best allies.

Note to Cat_Ballou, and those like her working out of what is probably an apartment in the city. Some of these things apply to you as well. However, if you do small amounts of traffic [one or two callers a day] and make their comings and goings as discreet as possible, you can usually get away with this in Manhattan.

These are a few tips. Don't ask me how I know these things, and I won't bother to fib in response. :)

With the acquiring of a good "third eye" to watch for problems, and the application of common sense security there is no reason you can't conduct business in a relatively safe** and practical manner.


I wish you luck, success, and no more hassels.
----

* What "JL" use to refer to as my "swashbucker" side is born in this. However, unfortunately, as we get older such free-spiritedness has to be balanced with common-sense and we can't play it as loose and breezy as we once did. You are learning that now.

** Relative to the fact that what is taking place is, after all, illegal under the laws of most states.
 
Originally posted by jp1064
What happens next babe? The article mentioned someting about seeing the judge Sept 3rd.
Its is never a good idea to discuss impeding adjudication with anyone other then one's lawyer.
 
Re: Re: hitler = socialist ????

Originally posted by Hyabby
And Stalin was a product of (and a natural extension of) the politics of the far left. Your point is?

I don't know what his point is, but mine would certainly be that both examples indicated solidly that the closer you come to a centerist, moderate, position; the closer one comes to common sense and sanity.
 
Originally posted by Thorn
Its is never a good idea to discuss impeding adjudication with anyone other then one's lawyer.
Talk about your Freudian type typos. :)

I meant, impending, of course.
 
Last edited:
Re: Re: hitler = socialist ????

Originally posted by Hyabby : And Stalin was a product of (and a natural extension of) the politics of the far left. Your point is?

If it is that the prior posts which equated the Clintons and FDR to Hitler were absurd, you are, of course, correct. Only one mass murderer in that lot.
Yep. That was my point. As you my recall, I was replying to another poster who was making the point that Hilary was just like hitler. Like you, I believe this sort of comparison is silly. Was there anything in my post that led you to believe that I had any other point?


Originally posted by Hyabby : But if your point was that only the far right can produce a monster, well then, no, afraid not.
Nope, this wasn't my point at all. Nice to see we are in complete agreement.
 
Re: Re: Re: hitler = socialist ????

Originally posted by Thorn
the closer you come to a centerist, moderate, position; the closer one comes to common sense and sanity.
I'll say a loud Amen to that...

Nice to see everyone playing well with others and sharing the crayons...
 
Re: Re: Re: hitler = socialist ????

Originally posted by Thorn
the closer you come to a centerist, moderate, position; the closer one comes to common sense and sanity.
NOT necessarily true.

In the state of Logickistan (made up), a parliament member is initiating legislation to impose capital punishment on all minorities that refuse to convert their religion to the one practiced by the majority.

The party(s) on the right says: "It's a good bill".
The Green party (moderate) says: "Let's execute only the males"
The party(s) on the left says: "Religion in general is a bad idea, let's not kill anybody, but shut off completely all government support to religion institutions and tax them".

Would you say then, that...
Originally posted by Thorn the closer you come to a centerist, moderate, position; the closer one comes to common sense and sanity.
 
Re: Re: Re: hitler = socialist ????

Originally posted by Thorn
the closer you come to a centerist, moderate, position; the closer one comes to common sense and sanity.
More often than not, "...centerist, moderate..." represents pure and precious (irony) mediocrity.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: hitler = socialist ????

Originally posted by gardener
NOT necessarily true.

In the state of Logickistan (made up), a parliament member is initiating legislation to impose capital punishment on all minorities that refuse to convert their religion to the one practiced by the majority.

The party(s) on the right says: "It's a good bill".
The Green party (moderate) says: "Let's execute only the males"
The party(s) on the left says: "Religion in general is a bad idea, let's not kill anybody, but shut off completely all government support to religion institutions and tax them".

Would you say then, that...
It seems to me that when the premise (the initial legislation) is that extreme to begin with, there is no moderate position. The premise is faulty to begin with -- state execution for anything other than the most heinous of crimes (if then) is obscene. There is no moderate position to be taken, and none of the options mentioned constitute one. One is wrong (kill everyone who disagrees with us), one is perverse (kill half the people who disagree with us), and the other is addressing a completely different issue (the value of religion and its relationship to government).
 
Top