Why don't you post on UG anymore?
- Thread starter Slinky Bender
- Start date
It's probably more evenhandedly exploitative* (although, one thing we've never discussed about the "other place" is if the WOCs who attend go there thinking "there's white dudes there - they don't know any better, we can get higher prices". I know that there is plenty of discussion amoung the WOCs who attend the "non-floating" "underground" "events" (over use of scare quotes?) in Manhattan that they won't go to Brooklyn events anymore because the "broke ass" black guys who populate these events want too much for too little (which is funny since I'm sure they used to go to these events and get the same $, but now they gotten used to "white guy pricing").
i.e. The women are there as much to "exploit" the wealth/fame/connections of the Johns as much as the Johns are there to exploit the sex workers. It's sort of a Predator's Ball of prostitution.
i.e. The women are there as much to "exploit" the wealth/fame/connections of the Johns as much as the Johns are there to exploit the sex workers. It's sort of a Predator's Ball of prostitution.
1. Oh, I'm certain of that.
2. The big lies essentially circle around the idea that the men consider the women to be social equals -- or that the men do not view the women as sex objects. I don't believe they do (or, in the second case, don't).
I don't mean to slander you guys, who I don't know personally and whom I like very much insofar as I "know" you as board personas. So let me make a general statement instead.
In my experience (and secondhand experience gleaned from talking to working girls), johns who are "cynical" about prostitution tend to be much more respectful of prostitutes, IRL, than johns who take a more "romantic" view of the industry.
2. The big lies essentially circle around the idea that the men consider the women to be social equals -- or that the men do not view the women as sex objects. I don't believe they do (or, in the second case, don't).
I don't mean to slander you guys, who I don't know personally and whom I like very much insofar as I "know" you as board personas. So let me make a general statement instead.
In my experience (and secondhand experience gleaned from talking to working girls), johns who are "cynical" about prostitution tend to be much more respectful of prostitutes, IRL, than johns who take a more "romantic" view of the industry.
That's what I would have said.
Wait. I guess not. Cuz I'd contend that that is AT LEAST equally true of the HoJo party.
So I think what I'd say is that ****** is more OBVIOUSLY exploitative, or more HONESTLY exploitative. I guess what I mean is that at ****** they don't wrap the (mutual) exploitation in bacon and serve it on a toothpick as an hor d'ourve.
Wait. I guess not. Cuz I'd contend that that is AT LEAST equally true of the HoJo party.
So I think what I'd say is that ****** is more OBVIOUSLY exploitative, or more HONESTLY exploitative. I guess what I mean is that at ****** they don't wrap the (mutual) exploitation in bacon and serve it on a toothpick as an hor d'ourve.
Last edited:
OK, I think I have figured out what the asterisks mean from SB's post: ****** (<--- presumably this will appear as asterisks if I have guessed correctly; we'll see.)
The answer is that I don't see much simlarity beyond the fact that they are both called parties and both are attended by providers and clients. ****** is simply one of the many possible modes and venues of The Biz, just another in the list of possibilities in/by which the prostitutes and their customers can do business. It fits in with streetwalking and massage parlors and classical brothels and outcall agencies and in/outcall indies and so forth. ****** doesn't particularly appeal to me in several ways, but I do not see it as fundamentally different from any of the other ways of hobbying.
The sort of parties JB brought up are simply not a member of this category, as I have been trying to explain above. They are ancillary activities for the most part.
Does that answer the question?
-Ww
The answer is that I don't see much simlarity beyond the fact that they are both called parties and both are attended by providers and clients. ****** is simply one of the many possible modes and venues of The Biz, just another in the list of possibilities in/by which the prostitutes and their customers can do business. It fits in with streetwalking and massage parlors and classical brothels and outcall agencies and in/outcall indies and so forth. ****** doesn't particularly appeal to me in several ways, but I do not see it as fundamentally different from any of the other ways of hobbying.
The sort of parties JB brought up are simply not a member of this category, as I have been trying to explain above. They are ancillary activities for the most part.
Does that answer the question?
-Ww
Last edited: