Why don't you post on UG anymore?

[Slinky Bender]

Because you can’t stand::


Notes: 1)You can vote on as many of the following as you want,
2) Votes by people who were never posters to begin with will be removed.

 

[h. von bingen]

i voted for myself just to start the ball rolling.

(it's the only person i voted for.)

 

[justlooking]

One problem with the poll as written is that it conveys the incorrect implication that you actually CAN'T post reviews of non-advertisers, when of course you can.

 

[justlooking]

I don't post anymore cuz francine can't post her phone number.

 

[Slinky Bender]

Originally posted by justlooking
One problem with the poll as written is that it conveys the incorrect implication that you actually CAN'T post reviews of non-advertisers, when of course you can.

Not really, because since so many idiots think that it's the case, it could easily be the reason they don't post. Reasons don't need to be logical (I mean, which other answer would be logical?).

 

[h. von bingen]

maybe the reason hombre doesn't post anymore is because of me. i'm going to call him up right now and ask him.

 

[justlooking]

Stupid To Get Into This

Originally posted by slinkybender
Not really, because since so many idiots think that it's the case, it could easily be the reason they don't post. Reasons don't need to be logical (I mean, which other answer would be logical?).

I understand that. I just meant that having it written that way, by the Moderator of the board, seems to endorce that misbelief.

It could have said, "That you think you cant' post reviews of non-advertisers."

 

[h. von bingen]

Originally posted by slinkybender
(I mean, which other answer would be logical?)

are you implying THORN is not logical?

 

[Cloud Nine]

sigh


yet another list of notables that I didnt make....

 

[Cloud Nine]

'cause if you think about it, according to rule 19, if someone doesnt post, its gotta be my fault.

 

[Cloud Nine]

and why isnt there an option for those of us who honestly dont give a fuck what anybody says and will post irregardless?

 

[h. von bingen]

if i win should i do a cat_ballou and HUFF off and claim i was RAILROADED?

(i'm going to practice my BEST VICTIM imitation.)

 

[h. von bingen]

Originally posted by Cloud Nine
and why isnt there an option for those of us who honestly dont give a fuck what anybody says and will post irregardless?

that is frighteningly close to well adjusted, i wouldn't let that get around.

 

[pjorourke]

Originally posted by h. von bingen
if i win should i ... HUFF off

Yeah! That would be the day.

 

[h. von bingen]

did you see cb when you were in ny?

(how is she?)

((still answering any old e m a i l off craig's list?))

(((she's quite the dumb cluck isn't she? think she'll vote?)))

 

[pjorourke]

Originally posted by h. von bingen
1. did you see cb when you were in ny?

2. (how is she?)

3. ((still answering any old e m a i l off craig's list?))

4. (((she's quite the dumb cluck isn't she? think she'll vote?)))

1) No 2) Fine last time I got an e-male 3) Don't know 4) If she votes, I have a pretty good idea what her vote would be.

 

[occasionalhobbyist]

Originally posted by Cloud Nine
and why isnt there an option for those of us who honestly dont give a fuck what anybody says and will post irregardless?

A few additional reasons, in no particular order:

1) None of the above

2) Bad grammar. (Irregardless... What the fuck is wrong with you? Were you raised by wolves?)

3) Lack of a functional review system that allows me to search for a specific provider and find actionable data about them.

4) I've been busy, so sue me!

5) The Drama

 

[occasionalhobbyist]

Re: Stupid To Get Into This

Originally posted by justlooking
I understand that. I just meant that having it written that way, by the Moderator of the board, seems to endorce that misbelief.

It could have said, "That you think you cant' post reviews of non-advertisers."

Have you tried clicking on it?

Maybe it's like Family Feud, where if someone clicks on that particular answer, a big X comes up on the computer and takes them over to the relevant rules section...

 

[h. von bingen]

Originally posted by pjorourke
4) If she votes, I have a pretty good idea what her vote would be.

ya think? last time she e m a i l e d me she was HORRIFIED at how she was being VICTIMIZED (albeit still answering every anonymous e m a i l on the internet). somebody should tell that chick not spill her guts.

 

[occasionalhobbyist]

6) Three-minute edit rule (not one of MY peeves, but might get some votes.)

7) Asterisks

8) The inexplicable editing of links so that url's for sites already included in the classified ads section no longer function properly, and the lack of response by administrators when queried about the decision... (Gee, you think that might be one I'd vote for?)