JAG is host of new Julie's web site - JAG is not Consumer Reports anymore!
- Thread starter Rufus Moses
- Start date
- Status
not only that....
but Ozzy gets invited to the White House, and by a President who was once the Governor of Texas (home of the Alamo)......... Dubya can't be all that bad.
but Ozzy gets invited to the White House, and by a President who was once the Governor of Texas (home of the Alamo)......... Dubya can't be all that bad.
Last edited:
tried finding a good account of the Alamo story but couldn't.
during his US tour of '83 (Diary Of A Madman) with Motley Crue, his wife Sharon locked his clothes away in a San Antonio hotel to prevent him going out and drinking. Ozzy solved the problem by putting on one of her evening dresses, went out, downed a bottle of Courvoisier and, needing to take a leak, made use of a convenient old wall nearby.
during his US tour of '83 (Diary Of A Madman) with Motley Crue, his wife Sharon locked his clothes away in a San Antonio hotel to prevent him going out and drinking. Ozzy solved the problem by putting on one of her evening dresses, went out, downed a bottle of Courvoisier and, needing to take a leak, made use of a convenient old wall nearby.
Sorry-This Too So Long!
Guys/Ladies,
Sorry, I have been away from the net for about 48 hours-and this thing seems to have taken a different spin. However, I do have to just answer or respond to a couple of Ozzy statements in his post back to me a few evenings ago.
Ozzy posted the following:
if you want to ask every single person on this board if they
only have one screen name then i'll answer your question
regarding this board...if you have an accusation to make than
make it. i will say this...if i wanted to post a review or make a
positive mention about some girl that i saw, i have every right
(as does anyone else) to use a different name so as to protect
my (or their) identity (real name or screen name).
Ozzy-just a couple of things about this:
1-I never asked everybody on this Board if they had more then one screen name. I just asked you if you posted under more then one name-and obviously you have answered that question with an Affirmative!
2-I have been making the accusations or statements all along. I do not believe people should post under more then one name or handle. People are who they are-and should not take on dual identities or dual personalities. This again, is only my opinion.
3-I agree you have the right according to the rules established on this Board to post under different names. I do not see why you need to protect your identity. However, if that is you wish-then so be. Shit-President Bush, Joe DiMaggio, Ted Williams, Joe Namath, and for that point Al Capone did not feel the need to disguise their true identity. Unless, you are more important then they are or were.
Ozzy went on to post the following:
it would defeat the purpose of being "the legend" (as you
refer to me)
Ozzy-I assure you that I have continually referred to you as not "the legend"-but as "the legend in his own mind". Those two titles have far different meanings. Please do not humor me by trying to have me heap false praise upon your ego.
Ozzy-then posted the following:
i'll use it (when i use it) to simply to post useful (and unbiased) information to the board.
Ozzy-again you are entitled to your opinion, and I will stick by mine.
Ozzy then posted:
bagger (who ever he or she is) didn't slander or bash anyone.
he (or she) did however make a truly amazing and spot on
analogy of the history.
Ozzy-did I say that he slandered someone?
Ozzy-concluded his post with the following:
PS...rufus was the first person to ever meet "Ozzy", and did
so long before there even was an Ozzy on the boards. rufus
and i may not always see eye to eye on several topics but,
what he says is a lot closer to the truth than anything i've
seen posted by MM or any other sources.
Ozzy I have two responses to this:
1-First of all, I could care the least about whoever met Ozzy first. It would be like me raving about which of the Board Members met the Rooster first. Who the hell really cares. We are only small potatoes in the larger picture of life. The last time I checked, unless I am way off-you nor I am Michael Jordan, Bobby Bonds, or Al Pacino.
2-The statement you closed with MM and Rufus-is certainly your opinion, and you are entitled to it.
Guys/Ladies,
Sorry, I have been away from the net for about 48 hours-and this thing seems to have taken a different spin. However, I do have to just answer or respond to a couple of Ozzy statements in his post back to me a few evenings ago.
Ozzy posted the following:
if you want to ask every single person on this board if they
only have one screen name then i'll answer your question
regarding this board...if you have an accusation to make than
make it. i will say this...if i wanted to post a review or make a
positive mention about some girl that i saw, i have every right
(as does anyone else) to use a different name so as to protect
my (or their) identity (real name or screen name).
Ozzy-just a couple of things about this:
1-I never asked everybody on this Board if they had more then one screen name. I just asked you if you posted under more then one name-and obviously you have answered that question with an Affirmative!
2-I have been making the accusations or statements all along. I do not believe people should post under more then one name or handle. People are who they are-and should not take on dual identities or dual personalities. This again, is only my opinion.
3-I agree you have the right according to the rules established on this Board to post under different names. I do not see why you need to protect your identity. However, if that is you wish-then so be. Shit-President Bush, Joe DiMaggio, Ted Williams, Joe Namath, and for that point Al Capone did not feel the need to disguise their true identity. Unless, you are more important then they are or were.
Ozzy went on to post the following:
it would defeat the purpose of being "the legend" (as you
refer to me)
Ozzy-I assure you that I have continually referred to you as not "the legend"-but as "the legend in his own mind". Those two titles have far different meanings. Please do not humor me by trying to have me heap false praise upon your ego.
Ozzy-then posted the following:
i'll use it (when i use it) to simply to post useful (and unbiased) information to the board.
Ozzy-again you are entitled to your opinion, and I will stick by mine.
Ozzy then posted:
bagger (who ever he or she is) didn't slander or bash anyone.
he (or she) did however make a truly amazing and spot on
analogy of the history.
Ozzy-did I say that he slandered someone?
Ozzy-concluded his post with the following:
PS...rufus was the first person to ever meet "Ozzy", and did
so long before there even was an Ozzy on the boards. rufus
and i may not always see eye to eye on several topics but,
what he says is a lot closer to the truth than anything i've
seen posted by MM or any other sources.
Ozzy I have two responses to this:
1-First of all, I could care the least about whoever met Ozzy first. It would be like me raving about which of the Board Members met the Rooster first. Who the hell really cares. We are only small potatoes in the larger picture of life. The last time I checked, unless I am way off-you nor I am Michael Jordan, Bobby Bonds, or Al Pacino.
2-The statement you closed with MM and Rufus-is certainly your opinion, and you are entitled to it.
Ozzy-then posted the following:
rooster...
first off..... please find someone besides me to occupy your time with.
second..... i gave you an answer to your question, i showed you my original screen name that i haven't used since november 2000 (pre "Ozzy"), and you took that remark to say that i use multiple names and you insinuate that i use them for less than honorable reasons. yet you decided not to address my guarantee to you that i have never used any other name to bash you or anyone else on this board. i said IF and when i choose to use an alternate name, then it's would only be for the purpose of posting reviews or helpful info to the board without having to risk exposing my true identity.
if you don't see the reason why some of us would prefer our privacy or separating our board personality from that of our real identity which we must sometimes expose to a provider (thru ID checks) than you are truly misguided and your opinion is very flawed. this is an illegal activity we all partake in and thus none of us use our real names on these boards......NOT EVEN YOU. if some less than honest (or mentally deficient) provider connects Ozzy to a real identity and decides to (or accidentally) divulges that identity to someone like say.....guy catelli who would simply love to post it to the boards.....well you see my reasons now. of course this can't happen because i don't tell providers that i'm Ozzy* and if i write a review i don't post it under "Ozzy. i also don't seek special treatment or discounts by throwing "Ozzy" around or i'd be spending all my days over at julies excepting freebies and shilling her place on the various boards during the times i'm not there.
*.....if you (or anyone else) don't understand the difference why i have no problem introducing myself as Ozzy at various events (nje or ug-g2g's) as opposed to providers, then i'll explain...... i'm not required to show my drivers lic when i attend these events. no one at those events even knows my first name, unlike providers who from time to time require you showing proper ID upon arrival.
As I stated above…please find someone else on the board to occupy your time with and make accusations against, you will find nothing here no matter how deep you dig into Ozzy’s or VV’s past, simply because there is nothing (other than a few rants and tantrums). You don’t always have to agree with my opinions but, you’re not going to find any wrong doings on my end. Anyone who actually reads what I write should know that about me….. besides, with the amount of people I’ve pissed off in the past on this board and others…you would think that someone would have dug something up on me by now.
rooster...
first off..... please find someone besides me to occupy your time with.
second..... i gave you an answer to your question, i showed you my original screen name that i haven't used since november 2000 (pre "Ozzy"), and you took that remark to say that i use multiple names and you insinuate that i use them for less than honorable reasons. yet you decided not to address my guarantee to you that i have never used any other name to bash you or anyone else on this board. i said IF and when i choose to use an alternate name, then it's would only be for the purpose of posting reviews or helpful info to the board without having to risk exposing my true identity.
if you don't see the reason why some of us would prefer our privacy or separating our board personality from that of our real identity which we must sometimes expose to a provider (thru ID checks) than you are truly misguided and your opinion is very flawed. this is an illegal activity we all partake in and thus none of us use our real names on these boards......NOT EVEN YOU. if some less than honest (or mentally deficient) provider connects Ozzy to a real identity and decides to (or accidentally) divulges that identity to someone like say.....guy catelli who would simply love to post it to the boards.....well you see my reasons now. of course this can't happen because i don't tell providers that i'm Ozzy* and if i write a review i don't post it under "Ozzy. i also don't seek special treatment or discounts by throwing "Ozzy" around or i'd be spending all my days over at julies excepting freebies and shilling her place on the various boards during the times i'm not there.
*.....if you (or anyone else) don't understand the difference why i have no problem introducing myself as Ozzy at various events (nje or ug-g2g's) as opposed to providers, then i'll explain...... i'm not required to show my drivers lic when i attend these events. no one at those events even knows my first name, unlike providers who from time to time require you showing proper ID upon arrival.
As I stated above…please find someone else on the board to occupy your time with and make accusations against, you will find nothing here no matter how deep you dig into Ozzy’s or VV’s past, simply because there is nothing (other than a few rants and tantrums). You don’t always have to agree with my opinions but, you’re not going to find any wrong doings on my end. Anyone who actually reads what I write should know that about me….. besides, with the amount of people I’ve pissed off in the past on this board and others…you would think that someone would have dug something up on me by now.
Last edited:
This Is All For This Thread For Me-Case Closed With The Rooster
Ozzy just posted the following:
rooster...
first off..... please find someone besides me to occupy your
time with.
Ozzy-I will try to do so in the future. However, since you are "The King of Posts" and "Lengend In Your Own Mind"-I just assumed you had far more time then I did. In fact, since I post on the Board about 2 to 4 times per week-and you seem to thrive on the Board far more then I do-this seems to confuse me a bit.
Ozzy next posted:
..... i gave you an answer to your question, i showed you my
original screen name that i haven't used since november 2000
(pre "Ozzy"), and you took that remark to say that i use
multiple names and you insinuate that i use them for less than
honorable reasons.
Ozzy-I do not think that I ever insinuated that you used the alternate screen names for less than honorable reasons. Are you feeling guilty for some reason? Please do not put words in my mouth.
Ozzy then posted:
this is an illegal activity we all partake in and thus none of us use our real names on these boards......NOT EVEN YOU.
Ozzy-that you are correct on. I would assume that your real name is not Ozzy. No problem on my end with you using the name Ozzy-I just have a gripe with using other screen names on here. If you got something to say or report to the guys and ladies-why not say it as Ozzy? Again-just my opinion on the matter. It certainly carries no more weight then yours does. I understand that.
Then Ozzy posted this:
i also don't seek special treatment or discounts by
throwing "Ozzy" around or i'd be spending all my days over at
julies excepting freebies and shilling her place on the various
boards during the times i'm not there.
Come on Ozzy-do you really think that you are that important? Shit-you really are "A Legend In Your Own Mind". However, I did notice how you were quite clever to get your Anti-Julies Poke in here. Oh-and got the shill thing in also!
Ozzy-in all honesty after reading your last paragraph about yourself-you need to have a reality check. You are correct-many of the innocent souls of this Board-just tend to ignore your countless rambling-and boasting about how "God All Perfect"you are.
Additionally, I only entered a response into this thread because I for one thought that Little Guy and Danny NJ had made some valid points toward the beginning of this thread. Shit-me hooking up on Little Guy's side, I think that had to be a first. However, I thought on this particular issue-that he had made some very valid points. Thus, my original points were intended more to try and point out that two sides existed to this story. I did not intend originally for this to become another flame edition of Rooster vs. Ozzy. In fact, if you read my original post about this thread-it did have several positive comments about the manner in which you and Rufus said what you had to say under your true Handles/Screen Names. Kudos for doing that. Then, it appeared to go in a somewhat different direction. For that, I think we both should shoulder just a bit of the blame. However, I know you well enough on this Board by now-and Ozzy never, ever, can openly agree that he made a mistake.
But you are correct about one thing-I do have better ways to occupy my time then to spend it debating with "The Legend In His Own Mind". Thus-this is the end of my input on this thread. Ramble as you see the need to do so-but I will not respond to anything else regarding this thread. Well-that is unless, I wish to do it under a new and different screen name/handle. Only joking-see you know that I would not do that.
Ozzy just posted the following:
rooster...
first off..... please find someone besides me to occupy your
time with.
Ozzy-I will try to do so in the future. However, since you are "The King of Posts" and "Lengend In Your Own Mind"-I just assumed you had far more time then I did. In fact, since I post on the Board about 2 to 4 times per week-and you seem to thrive on the Board far more then I do-this seems to confuse me a bit.
Ozzy next posted:
..... i gave you an answer to your question, i showed you my
original screen name that i haven't used since november 2000
(pre "Ozzy"), and you took that remark to say that i use
multiple names and you insinuate that i use them for less than
honorable reasons.
Ozzy-I do not think that I ever insinuated that you used the alternate screen names for less than honorable reasons. Are you feeling guilty for some reason? Please do not put words in my mouth.
Ozzy then posted:
this is an illegal activity we all partake in and thus none of us use our real names on these boards......NOT EVEN YOU.
Ozzy-that you are correct on. I would assume that your real name is not Ozzy. No problem on my end with you using the name Ozzy-I just have a gripe with using other screen names on here. If you got something to say or report to the guys and ladies-why not say it as Ozzy? Again-just my opinion on the matter. It certainly carries no more weight then yours does. I understand that.
Then Ozzy posted this:
i also don't seek special treatment or discounts by
throwing "Ozzy" around or i'd be spending all my days over at
julies excepting freebies and shilling her place on the various
boards during the times i'm not there.
Come on Ozzy-do you really think that you are that important? Shit-you really are "A Legend In Your Own Mind". However, I did notice how you were quite clever to get your Anti-Julies Poke in here. Oh-and got the shill thing in also!
Ozzy-in all honesty after reading your last paragraph about yourself-you need to have a reality check. You are correct-many of the innocent souls of this Board-just tend to ignore your countless rambling-and boasting about how "God All Perfect"you are.
Additionally, I only entered a response into this thread because I for one thought that Little Guy and Danny NJ had made some valid points toward the beginning of this thread. Shit-me hooking up on Little Guy's side, I think that had to be a first. However, I thought on this particular issue-that he had made some very valid points. Thus, my original points were intended more to try and point out that two sides existed to this story. I did not intend originally for this to become another flame edition of Rooster vs. Ozzy. In fact, if you read my original post about this thread-it did have several positive comments about the manner in which you and Rufus said what you had to say under your true Handles/Screen Names. Kudos for doing that. Then, it appeared to go in a somewhat different direction. For that, I think we both should shoulder just a bit of the blame. However, I know you well enough on this Board by now-and Ozzy never, ever, can openly agree that he made a mistake.
But you are correct about one thing-I do have better ways to occupy my time then to spend it debating with "The Legend In His Own Mind". Thus-this is the end of my input on this thread. Ramble as you see the need to do so-but I will not respond to anything else regarding this thread. Well-that is unless, I wish to do it under a new and different screen name/handle. Only joking-see you know that I would not do that.
Last edited:
I'll agree with you Slinky. Right out here in the open, and I have more then a few posts. 
What you said makes a lot of sense. And this coming from someone who frequently goes on at length about seeing "quality women" at $300 and under.
We both have valid points, I believe.
Mine settle around the set that defines the availabilities of "Inna's" at $250 before they start making $600+.
I argue that they are out there, just a bit harder to find.
The set that defines your agruement is just as legitimate. There is value at the $600 range when you receive treatment and service far in excess of what one can usually expect at $300.
The problem is, the water regarding such bits of business are so muddy. Its not like real estate, where you might find your occassional bargain, but for the most part value/$ spent is well defined. A buck is a buck is a buck.
In this realm a buck can be anything from $.10 to $3.00. If I am making my point?
So, while I can condone my taking more time to do the research, put the time and the occassional very dissatisfactory experience in to find the diamonds among the zircons; I can't not condone the actions of those who try to assure themselves a good experience with known providers giving a known quantity of service at the $600 level.
Ok, I am not sure I made my point, but my head hurts and I'm not prepared to do better then that right now.
The bottomline is, this board would be of better service to the community at large if those who saw the providers in this range felt free to provide info on those providers.
Perhaps a section, like the NY/NJ/CT Spa section, etc, devoted to the $600+ experience? I mean, there is a section called "Cheap Thrills". Why not its counterpart ["Expensive Tastes", perhaps]?
What you said makes a lot of sense. And this coming from someone who frequently goes on at length about seeing "quality women" at $300 and under.
We both have valid points, I believe.
Mine settle around the set that defines the availabilities of "Inna's" at $250 before they start making $600+.
I argue that they are out there, just a bit harder to find.
The set that defines your agruement is just as legitimate. There is value at the $600 range when you receive treatment and service far in excess of what one can usually expect at $300.
The problem is, the water regarding such bits of business are so muddy. Its not like real estate, where you might find your occassional bargain, but for the most part value/$ spent is well defined. A buck is a buck is a buck.
In this realm a buck can be anything from $.10 to $3.00. If I am making my point?
So, while I can condone my taking more time to do the research, put the time and the occassional very dissatisfactory experience in to find the diamonds among the zircons; I can't not condone the actions of those who try to assure themselves a good experience with known providers giving a known quantity of service at the $600 level.
Ok, I am not sure I made my point, but my head hurts and I'm not prepared to do better then that right now.
The bottomline is, this board would be of better service to the community at large if those who saw the providers in this range felt free to provide info on those providers.
Perhaps a section, like the NY/NJ/CT Spa section, etc, devoted to the $600+ experience? I mean, there is a section called "Cheap Thrills". Why not its counterpart ["Expensive Tastes", perhaps]?
Last edited:
Um...
I post on the Board about 2 to 4 times per week
Profile For RoosterC74
Search for all posts by this user.
Date Registered: 03-16-2001
Status: Gold
Total Posts: 871 (2.23 posts per day)
You got more to say than me
Profile For justme
Search for all posts by this user.
Date Registered: 12-02-2000
Status: Vinyl
Total Posts: 962 (1.94 posts per day)
Of course....
Profile For Ozzy
Date Registered: 12-06-2000
Status: Legend In His Own Mind
Total Posts: 2627 (5.35 posts per day)
I post on the Board about 2 to 4 times per week
Profile For RoosterC74
Search for all posts by this user.
Date Registered: 03-16-2001
Status: Gold
Total Posts: 871 (2.23 posts per day)
You got more to say than me
Profile For justme
Search for all posts by this user.
Date Registered: 12-02-2000
Status: Vinyl
Total Posts: 962 (1.94 posts per day)
Of course....
Profile For Ozzy
Date Registered: 12-06-2000
Status: Legend In His Own Mind
Total Posts: 2627 (5.35 posts per day)
And When You Do Not Get Your Way
Ozzy,
As usual when you do not get your way-you write something highly inflamable about someone else-such as you need to seek pyschiatric. It appears to me-like the you are once again getting quite desperate.
As for your comment about how many times I used your name in this thread-you are correct. But in return-how about your use of my name? And what is even more important-is not how many times you used my name-but the way that you respond to it.
JustMe,
Your mention of my answer to the question of posting on the Board is correct. You are absolutely correct with the wording. However, what I meant was that I read or sign in on the Board 2 to 4 times per week. What I was trying to convey to the Board Members-is that I usually checked the Board 2 to 4 times per week. However, each of those 2 to 4 days that I sign in on the Board-I usually make multiple posts.
JustMe-you are absolute correct-in pointing out my error of wording. I hope the above explanation clears matters up. Addtionally, you made an excellent point-and did point out an error in my posting. Oops-sorry for the less then perfectly accurate information.
Ozzy,
As usual when you do not get your way-you write something highly inflamable about someone else-such as you need to seek pyschiatric. It appears to me-like the you are once again getting quite desperate.
As for your comment about how many times I used your name in this thread-you are correct. But in return-how about your use of my name? And what is even more important-is not how many times you used my name-but the way that you respond to it.
JustMe,
Your mention of my answer to the question of posting on the Board is correct. You are absolutely correct with the wording. However, what I meant was that I read or sign in on the Board 2 to 4 times per week. What I was trying to convey to the Board Members-is that I usually checked the Board 2 to 4 times per week. However, each of those 2 to 4 days that I sign in on the Board-I usually make multiple posts.
JustMe-you are absolute correct-in pointing out my error of wording. I hope the above explanation clears matters up. Addtionally, you made an excellent point-and did point out an error in my posting. Oops-sorry for the less then perfectly accurate information.
- Status