"Some guys may not want to admit they pay that much more than so many of the others for the same pussy, some may not want to admit to being ripped off by girls in that range (and look the real fool). "
Part of my point was that the guys who do see these agencies/girls don't post about it because it is so ill received on the boards. If someone posts a good review, guy only say "well, for $600 you'd better get all that - you still got ripped off". If someone asks for a recommendation in that price range, they only get "Why do you want that ? They're all a ripoff. See a $200 girl instead". And god forbid anyone would admit to anything less than a stellar session at that price point - they'd be ridiculed until the next decade. But the result is really a loss to all of us, whther we ever want to go that route or not. We just get cut off from any meaningful discussion on the topic altogether. I really think it's a shame, if only becaue I think that knowledge of other's experiences can help us see things about our own.
However, I must say that I think at least part of it is that there are at least some guys who don't want to hear anything about it. I think that they don't want to see, hear, smell or feel anything about girls who they can't afford, because it would make it harder for them to fool themselves into thinking that they are getting "the best there is". My most telling evidence of this is seeing descriptions of large numbers of providers in the $200 category decribed as "10's", "the most beautiful woman I've ever seen in my life", etc. NB: I'm not saying that at $600 you necessarily get those either, just that it's evidence that there is at least some self delusion going on. I'm also not "putting down" $200 women ( although, considering the amount of 'ptting down of anyyone conisderably over that price, I don't know why I should be worrying about it ). However, this concept that there just can't be anything better about anyone who charges more - that's right can't be - is just plain moronic.
Now, this doesn't mean I'm telling anyone that they should see a $600 woman, ever. I'm not telling them that they are a great bargain, and if they don't so one, they are an idiot. It's just that the continual littany from those who don't show the same respect the other way cuts off an awful lot of what could be meaningful discussion. Hell, I could very well make the same arguments against guys who see $250 women - that "pussy is pussy", and "you can get some" for $40, so why pay all that much ( i.e. $250 ). Look, there's as much repeat business at $1,000/hr agenices as $150/hr agencies. Is it just that everyone who uses $1,000/hr agencies is a total moron ? I find it hard to swallow an argument that the group of guys making 7 figures in NYC is largely populated with total idiots.
So why is it that it's just impossible to have a conversation about anything higher priced, because if someone ever tries to start one, a bunch of guys who have never even "used the product" jump in to decry the product in toto ?
( don't look, you know what's coming )
It's like driving, were anyone who drives slower than you is a "moron", and anyone who drives faster than you is a "maniac". Here, anyone who spends less than you ( that generic "you" ) is a "cheapskate" and anyone who spends more than you do is an "idiot".
Part of my point was that the guys who do see these agencies/girls don't post about it because it is so ill received on the boards. If someone posts a good review, guy only say "well, for $600 you'd better get all that - you still got ripped off". If someone asks for a recommendation in that price range, they only get "Why do you want that ? They're all a ripoff. See a $200 girl instead". And god forbid anyone would admit to anything less than a stellar session at that price point - they'd be ridiculed until the next decade. But the result is really a loss to all of us, whther we ever want to go that route or not. We just get cut off from any meaningful discussion on the topic altogether. I really think it's a shame, if only becaue I think that knowledge of other's experiences can help us see things about our own.
However, I must say that I think at least part of it is that there are at least some guys who don't want to hear anything about it. I think that they don't want to see, hear, smell or feel anything about girls who they can't afford, because it would make it harder for them to fool themselves into thinking that they are getting "the best there is". My most telling evidence of this is seeing descriptions of large numbers of providers in the $200 category decribed as "10's", "the most beautiful woman I've ever seen in my life", etc. NB: I'm not saying that at $600 you necessarily get those either, just that it's evidence that there is at least some self delusion going on. I'm also not "putting down" $200 women ( although, considering the amount of 'ptting down of anyyone conisderably over that price, I don't know why I should be worrying about it ). However, this concept that there just can't be anything better about anyone who charges more - that's right can't be - is just plain moronic.
Now, this doesn't mean I'm telling anyone that they should see a $600 woman, ever. I'm not telling them that they are a great bargain, and if they don't so one, they are an idiot. It's just that the continual littany from those who don't show the same respect the other way cuts off an awful lot of what could be meaningful discussion. Hell, I could very well make the same arguments against guys who see $250 women - that "pussy is pussy", and "you can get some" for $40, so why pay all that much ( i.e. $250 ). Look, there's as much repeat business at $1,000/hr agenices as $150/hr agencies. Is it just that everyone who uses $1,000/hr agencies is a total moron ? I find it hard to swallow an argument that the group of guys making 7 figures in NYC is largely populated with total idiots.
So why is it that it's just impossible to have a conversation about anything higher priced, because if someone ever tries to start one, a bunch of guys who have never even "used the product" jump in to decry the product in toto ?
( don't look, you know what's coming )
It's like driving, were anyone who drives slower than you is a "moron", and anyone who drives faster than you is a "maniac". Here, anyone who spends less than you ( that generic "you" ) is a "cheapskate" and anyone who spends more than you do is an "idiot".
Last edited: