Higher mileage during Lap dances

Status
Not open for further replies.
P

pjorourke

Thinks he's Caesar's Wife
#641
#641
Re: Re: little lawyer . . .

Originally posted by lawyer101
HVB,
Thank you for trying to appeal to my intellectual side. I am glad that you have taken an interest in lawyer101..:)
I must point out that based on what you are trying to say, the term “obsequious” was used incorrectly. The word in itself refers to “attempting to win favor from influential people by flattery”. Unfortunately, JL would not be an influential person to me. A proper sentence Containing the word “obsequious” is as follows: His servants weeping, “Obsequious” to his orders, bear him hither. Obsequious refers to flattery to someone of power, such as a boss. JL does not meet this criteria,so the word was used incorrectly.

Th term “fawn” gets your point across correctly. This refers to: “seeking favor or attention by flattery. An example of this is what a dog does by wagging its tail, whining, or cringing to get
attention from his master. This does not refer to influential people, but to people in your everyday life.

Your message should have read as follows: “ I loathe those that engage in the act of fawning”.

Disclaimer: This was only an English lesson. This was not meant to offend in any
Way…:)
Click to expand...
Oh look! JL and lawyer101 are related. They both have the same middle name - Tediously Didactic.
 
J

jseah

#642
#642
Originally posted by pjorourke
Do interns pee on the floor?
Click to expand...
When they do, you just have to yell NO! and smush their nose into it........they will learn not to do it again...

of course, when you have to leave for a while, you should always crate them so they can't get into trouble.
 
Slinky Bender

Slinky Bender

The All Powerful Moderator
#644
#644
I think one huge potential problem with the next generation of lawyers is going to be in research methods. Since everyone is only doing computer searches, and law libraries have become like elephant graveyards, the "art" of leafing through law books is rapidly disappearing. The reason why I think this will be a problem is that computer searches are funny things: you have to look for key words and phrases, rather than concepts. i think that many lawyers are going to totally overlook cases whic are indded right on point because they don't contain the poper search key words, I think that under the "old methodology" and awful lot of "eurika" went on when someone stumbled over the "magic bullet" decision from a case which seemed to be unrealated from teh fact pattern, but in reality the legal concepts were spot on.
 
S

Sinful7

#645
#645
7 working for Herself

Okay here what happend I had the office two months
ago had a bachlor party there got really wild and management
caught wind and out we went. I am now looking for
office space in an industrial area, but most of the space is
too many square feet, but the hunt is on. Plus I have investors
that are in my ass to get this shit up and running, also for
those that don't know "Meals on Wheels" will be starting
in two weeks, all that left to do with that is the interior of
the van and I need a new muffler, everything will be scheduled
through the website, so as you can tell I have alot on my plate
Oh! and I will still be at Xdreams and I think I might do
Ass-com on Sundays......and I have to keep up with UG.

Can someone put me on with Rule 17

***Office will be opened by July, taking any ideas
Tell me what you think I need to create the best
sex enivornment in a office of 1-on-1 Sex in
search of an Out of Body Experience
 
W

Wwanderer

Kids, don't try this at home
#646
#646
Re: Re: Re: little lawyer . . .

Originally posted by pjorourke
Oh look! JL and lawyer101 are related. They both have the same middle name - Tediously Didactic.
Click to expand...
This, btw, is an example of a post that is neither obsequious nor fawning re the "most respected...".

-Ww
 
J

justlooking

#648
#648
Originally posted by slinkybender
I think one huge potential problem with the next generation of lawyers is going to be in research methods. Since everyone is only doing computer searches, and law libraries have become like elephant graveyards, the "art" of leafing through law books is rapidly disappearing. The reason why I think this will be a problem is that computer searches are funny things: you have to look for key words and phrases, rather than concepts. i think that many lawyers are going to totally overlook cases whic are indded right on point because they don't contain the poper search key words, I think that under the "old methodology" and awful lot of "eurika" went on when someone stumbled over the "magic bullet" decision from a case which seemed to be unrealated from teh fact pattern, but in reality the legal concepts were spot on.
Click to expand...
I would like to give this post the biggest DITTO I can.

This is a huge concern of mine.
 
H

h. von bingen

Sharon
#649
#649
Re: Re: Re: little lawyer . . .

Originally posted by pjorourke
Oh look! JL and lawyer101 are related. They both have the same middle name - Tediously Didactic.
Click to expand...
well jl is may be tediously didactic but he is usually correct. the distinction lawyer 101 made is not accurate (at least according to webster).
 
H

h. von bingen

Sharon
#650
#650
Originally posted by slinkybender
I think one huge potential problem with the next generation of lawyers is going to be in research methods. Since everyone is only doing computer searches, and law libraries have become like elephant graveyards, the "art" of leafing through law books is rapidly disappearing. The reason why I think this will be a problem is that computer searches are funny things: you have to look for key words and phrases, rather than concepts. i think that many lawyers are going to totally overlook cases whic are indded right on point because they don't contain the poper search key words, I think that under the "old methodology" and awful lot of "eurika" went on when someone stumbled over the "magic bullet" decision from a case which seemed to be unrealated from teh fact pattern, but in reality the legal concepts were spot on.
Click to expand...
i also can't agree more. it is is difficult to get an overview of an area of law* by doing discrete searches. oth, some partners still can't use a computer (a more egregious sin in my opinion). hopefully, young lawyers that are too lazy to go to the law library, will get bitten on the ass enough by missing something important and realize that you have to crack a book.

an interesting development: lots of little firms are doing away with physical libraries altogether, so it entails the associate schlepping her ass to 44th street or where ever.

you know jl, eventually, they'll realize, it's EASIER to start with the books. (hopefully.)

*nb: hombre and i have this argument re computer manuals as well. i like to see them in black and white so i can get an idea of what the program does generally.
 
Thorn

Thorn

#654
#654
Re: Re: little lawyer . . .

Originally posted by lawyer101
Unfortunately, JL would not be an influential person to me. Th term “fawn” gets your point across correctly. This refers to: “seeking favor or attention by flattery. An example of this is what a dog does by wagging its tail, whining, or cringing to get
attention from his master. This does not refer to influential people, but to people in your everyday life.

Your message should have read as follows: “ I loathe those that engage in the act of fawning”.

Disclaimer: This was only an English lesson. This was not meant to offend in any
Way…:)
Click to expand...
Man, you are pounding on that irony button. Its going to stick like that and I'll hold you responsible for any repairs. :D
 
Thorn

Thorn

#655
#655
Originally posted by lawyer101
All of my bosses are cool. Everyone uses the Internet. Some of my colleagues even download songs and movies. Some of the pervs even download porn. As long as the work gets done, no one gets bothered. I brought in the most $$$ out of all the legal aides to date, so I know that they wouldn’t have a problem with me being on the Internet. I understand that this is a privilege, so I make sure not to abuse it.
Click to expand...
Its a LAW firm.

NEVER supply ammo when you don't have to. EVER.

I have three words for you. Primedias Web Tunnel. It will allow you, when installed on your system, to breach the firewall with impunit;, causing no damage to the network and no risk above the norm to the security of the network.

Plus it will clear you system of most residue from your posting. Though, to be sure I advise the use of "Evidence Eradicator" on work systems.

It ALWAYS pays to know more about your co-workers [particularly bosses] then they know about you AND the job you save may be your own.

That lesson was free, because you so kindly assisted HVB with her vocabulary. The next one will cost ya. :) [just joshin']
 
Thorn

Thorn

#656
#656
Re: Re: Re: little lawyer . . .

Originally posted by slinkybender
..........................logic fault..........................................
Click to expand...
See, 101... Slinky understand irony too. :)

But this is becoming the perverbal dead horse, well beaten.

:)
 
P

pjorourke

Thinks he's Caesar's Wife
#658
#658
Originally posted by h. von bingen
*nb: hombre and i have this argument re computer manuals as well. i like to see them in black and white so i can get an idea of what the program does generally.
Click to expand...
I with hombre on this one. I think that good software should be written in such a maner that its use is intuitively obvious without consulting any manual. I don't use software that doesn't meet this criteria.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top