looks are too subjective to rate
which is why everyones looks vary in scoring...the best way to judge is an honest pic..of course most girls retouch their photos but it is not inconcievable that one guy can find me really hot and you think I'm a 4....not everyone has your tastebuds...there are people who find me very sexy,i still turn heads on the street sometimes,and yes,you are a prick for using me as barometer to measure your displeasure with a system you dont like. To some guys service is more important than looks,to some guys honesty is attractive...i know that as a provider i put myself out there for judgement but frankly all this discussion is starting to affect me ..i woke up really depressed this morning....thick skin is still skin amd mine feels a little thinner today so please(at the risk of opening myself to more derision)stop already!!!
Ozzy said:
Again... On *** there is no relative rating system. They rate on an equal scale... Miki a 7 (I'm going by the numbers she gave me... I didn't check myself) and they rate Gizele from a 5 to a 9 with mostly 8's. But we've been thru this rating thing before so it's a dead horse.
The real point I was making is that on the *** "mesg board" the ass kissing fluffballers over there don't make the distinctions we're making now so as to not hurt anyone’s feelings. So anyone who happens apon that board without the knowledge of who these girls are or without the use of pictures to judge for themselves... they would be thinking Gizele and Miki are somewhat equal in looks, and that's just not the case.
But if those same people happen apon UG, they would find that guys here DO make these distinctions between the girls and they'd know there's a vast difference between the two..... And that's why women like Miki prefer the way things are over there rather than here. Over there they're on somewhat equal footing and over here they get pushed off a cliff and exposed.... so to speak.
Now in all fairness to Miki... as Bender pointed out... she's not deceiving anyone by using fake or obscured pictures. So it's not about her being dishonest... it's about the posters on *** who are being deceiving and dishonest. Here on UG as much as I have to say about the dopes who post here….. they’re way more honest (blatantly so) and the truth always comes out and unfortunately sometimes the truth hurts.
Now personally.. if I had to put numbers to the girls.... and I'll assume Gizele is an 8 (though I think she's more like a 9+), but sticking to that 8..... Miki would have to be a 4 or 5 tops. Now I might sound like a prick for giving Miki a 4.... But if I made her anything higher than that, where would I rate most of Vals girls, Blonde Kelly, Felicia, Victoria25 or any of the other advertisers on UG, who obviously are all someplace between Miki and Gizele on the 1-10 scale.
The real point I was making is that on the *** "mesg board" the ass kissing fluffballers over there don't make the distinctions we're making now so as to not hurt anyone’s feelings. So anyone who happens apon that board without the knowledge of who these girls are or without the use of pictures to judge for themselves... they would be thinking Gizele and Miki are somewhat equal in looks, and that's just not the case.
But if those same people happen apon UG, they would find that guys here DO make these distinctions between the girls and they'd know there's a vast difference between the two..... And that's why women like Miki prefer the way things are over there rather than here. Over there they're on somewhat equal footing and over here they get pushed off a cliff and exposed.... so to speak.
Now in all fairness to Miki... as Bender pointed out... she's not deceiving anyone by using fake or obscured pictures. So it's not about her being dishonest... it's about the posters on *** who are being deceiving and dishonest. Here on UG as much as I have to say about the dopes who post here….. they’re way more honest (blatantly so) and the truth always comes out and unfortunately sometimes the truth hurts.
Now personally.. if I had to put numbers to the girls.... and I'll assume Gizele is an 8 (though I think she's more like a 9+), but sticking to that 8..... Miki would have to be a 4 or 5 tops. Now I might sound like a prick for giving Miki a 4.... But if I made her anything higher than that, where would I rate most of Vals girls, Blonde Kelly, Felicia, Victoria25 or any of the other advertisers on UG, who obviously are all someplace between Miki and Gizele on the 1-10 scale.