I have to agree. In my mind, if the money went in pre-flop, none of those are bad beats. The first one you lose 40% of the time. The second one you lose 45% of the time and even with the Jacks, you are only a 70%.
In every case they just need to hit one card to beat you.
In my opinion, there are 2 things required for it to be a bad beat.
1. They really shouldn't make the call. Only a moron would make that call.
2. They need to hit at least 2 cards on the board to beat you. (like if you have an over pair to both their cards)
I don't know the relative chip stacks or who was betting and who was calling, but if the blinds were high and the stacks were low, I can see pushing with all three of those hands and sometimes calling with them as well.
Now, if the flop comes all blanks, and then the money goes in after the flop, all the scenarios move up to bad-beats. With only 2 cards to come, any call they make is a bad one as their odds are worse. But when the money goes in pre-flop, that's just poker.
In every case they just need to hit one card to beat you.
In my opinion, there are 2 things required for it to be a bad beat.
1. They really shouldn't make the call. Only a moron would make that call.
2. They need to hit at least 2 cards on the board to beat you. (like if you have an over pair to both their cards)
I don't know the relative chip stacks or who was betting and who was calling, but if the blinds were high and the stacks were low, I can see pushing with all three of those hands and sometimes calling with them as well.
Now, if the flop comes all blanks, and then the money goes in after the flop, all the scenarios move up to bad-beats. With only 2 cards to come, any call they make is a bad one as their odds are worse. But when the money goes in pre-flop, that's just poker.