A rant...or why do you guys undermine the earning potential of UG

Status
Not open for further replies.
#46
MikitheMilf said:
you guys are obviously not getting the point...i dont give a rats ass what you like or dont like...nor do i care if you pay $40 or $2000...or if i ever see anyone of you...thats up you to you..my business is good...I'm talking about the life of our board and the business end of it...i'm talking about business, Slinkys business...NO CHICK WANTS TO BE ATTACKED...and I'm not talking about reviews either..I'm talking about unprovoked,nasty,childish commentary that neither informs or has any basis in reality...no one cares if you think the chick is fat or overpriced or what not...all these posts do is chase away revenue from this board...DO YOU GUYS THINK THIS IS SLINKYS DAMN HOBBY????????????thia board is a business and you guys are fucking shit up...nobody wants to advertise in a hostile environment...BTW i dont the majority of business from here,just some...my career would continue w/o you guys...I'm here because its a great forum for discussion,honest,varied and interesting,call me old and overpriced,you have since the beginning...i will survive...but how long can UG survive w/o advertisers...you are cutting off your nuts to spite yourselves...THINK!!!!
Although I agree with you about not insulting women just for putting up ads, I think you're missing the point here, Miki. I'm not gonna let the board owner's financial considerations affect what I post. I'm not here to look out for him. If the board can't survive with uninhibited posting, then I wouldn't want it anyway.

MikitheMilf said:
and i was not putting BMM down...
You have a funny way of not putting people down.
 
#49
justlooking said:
No. That says you think someone in the world could be in the $1000 range.

No one would believe it if I told them.

Actress's are in that range for me

Meg Ryan and Heather Locklear when they were in their 20's
 
#50
justlooking said:
Even that you would pay $300 for someone . . . . it might be better to keep it quiet, actually, cause it might upset some people's worldview.

If I got an actress for $300, it would be my secret.
 
#56
justlooking said:
The problem is that this has become the Cheapskate Board.
This is probably the biggest change I've seen in my 3 years here.There were always rude,obnoxious posts,gratuitous attacks,etc. but there was a greater price range that was discussed.Maybe,if a woman was not going to read the board or was thick skinned enough to deal with the insults,she would place an ad if she thought there were guys reading the board who were willing to pay more than $250/hr.The perception now may be that we are all cheap mofos,when some of the most active threads are about how hard it is to find a good SW these days for a $40 BJ.But even the SW threads are about the cheap skankier SWs.I like the street scene but am hesitant to post info about much better looking bar girls I find,or web based escorts who I consider a great value at $300.It seems like there is no interest.There is nothing wrong with a cheap thrills section,but it's economically difficult to sustain a cheap thrills board.

Although I agree generally with Miki,there are some girls who not only can't tolerate gratuitous insults,but can't stand legitimate criticism and have come to expect the unanimous unconditional adulation they receive in other forums.Ain't gonna happen here.
 
#60
I disagree with bashing these girls for their advertised price. They are quite literally putting a price on their bodies and they damned well can name their own price. It's up to me and others as to whether or not they're willing to pay the price. But again, I disagree with the name-calling and bashing when a provider advertised "$300 per hour." She can charge $3,000 an hour is she wants to. Obviously the response to her ad will dictate what she can realistically make. She doesn't need bitter, cheap assholes on the board lighting them up when they advertise.

For the record I agree 100% with the orgional post. This is a very viscious board - especially in regards to the treatment girls get who advertise. I would say a new rule would be (IMHO) that if a girl pays for ad space she cannot be bashed unless she actually does something that justifes being bashed - not just posting an ad.

You can pick almost any post where a girl posted an ad and just watch the string of broke, bitter assholes light the thread up with their negative bullshit. I've got bad new for you - the going rate for a decent provider for fs is from $250 or $300 an hour. Can't afford it? Then go troll the streets for skank SWs!

And lastly, I can definitely imagine that the conversation you had about this board was negative. It's the most negative board I know. Funny as hell. But horribly negative.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top