Slipping off the condom; gamesmanship or scumbag move?
- Thread starter Seekingsmash7
- Start date
Looked this up while they might not be a Specific law it is wrong and the woman can press charges of physical abuse as well as mental abuse. She agreed to covered sex for what ever her reasons are that is her right to protect her body from pregnancy or illness by taking the cover off with out her consent he just violated and taken her rights away which he can and may still face charged if chooses to so.As of now he can be charged in family court which does hold jail time as well as treatment and can be taken to civil court as well
There are a lot of eyes on this site. While it's easy to blame this mythical "White Knight" every time a girl finds her review or balks at a low ball offer, there is an equal chance she found it on her own.
Sometimes woman stumble on it and then share it with another online chat group.
We're not on the dark web.
Sometimes woman stumble on it and then share it with another online chat group.
We're not on the dark web.
FWIW, This topic has come up before but only in passing reference.
I remember guys saying the best time to do it was in doggie because she'll never feel the difference.
I also remember Sinful7 talking about guys trying to be cunning and cum inside her on the sly.
So I'm wondering how much of this anger is a result of the act itself or because of the persona who perpetrated the act?
Or both?
I remember guys saying the best time to do it was in doggie because she'll never feel the difference.
I also remember Sinful7 talking about guys trying to be cunning and cum inside her on the sly.
So I'm wondering how much of this anger is a result of the act itself or because of the persona who perpetrated the act?
Or both?
Last edited:
It’s considered rape in other countries but not in the United States.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeand...ly-took-off-his-condom-during-sex-its-a-thing
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeand...ly-took-off-his-condom-during-sex-its-a-thing
Seekingsmash7: most of us are not here to destroy you or order your castration.
that said, you [should] know that "there are rules to this life of ours".
word of advice:
admit that you were not in your "right mind" when you removed the cover without consent, and accept responsibility for interfering with the independence of another human being.
it doesn't help your case when you try to defend the indefensible. show the "community" that you are a stand up guy.
on a personal note, perhaps you should ask yourself why did you go to such lengths to fulfill such a simple desire?
that said, you [should] know that "there are rules to this life of ours".
word of advice:
admit that you were not in your "right mind" when you removed the cover without consent, and accept responsibility for interfering with the independence of another human being.
it doesn't help your case when you try to defend the indefensible. show the "community" that you are a stand up guy.
on a personal note, perhaps you should ask yourself why did you go to such lengths to fulfill such a simple desire?
It has nothing to do with the persona. The truth is Smash is a great contributor to the board and that is what UG is really about, but unfortunately he is also a rapist, violating the woman's right to ask for something as simple as a condom. He has every right to say no to her request, but has no right to violate her right to ask for it. He needs to walk away from that. This guy is literally taking her pussy and body to a level beyond what she is comfortable with, without her knowledge. How is this not common sense? That is like saying, she was comfortable kissing me, so why couldn't I fuck her, just because that is what I really wanted...In my opinion, even with all of his contribution, this guy is not like most of us, he is a violator and should be removed.
With sex and most things in life between two parties, you must have consensual mutual agreement. Since there is no written contract, "your word" is the contract.
If the shoe was on the other foot and you both agreed to raw and she gave "her word" that she was not afflicted with disease, but she knew she was and gave it to you and you gave it to your SO, look at what a tangled distorted mess we have, just because someone failed to "keep their word," or to honor and respect the other by telling the truth.
What I get here is a "revenge," a domination of another human being possibly as retaliation from an incident perpetrated upon this gentleman by a female for which he was prevented from retaliation at the time and now every woman must suffer his indignation.
It is also a mindset born many years ago that really is not so much shared on this board that "She is nothing but a whore, anyway."
On this board, we are gentlemen that derive much pleasure from these ladies and some of us treat them with great respect, fully knowing that "But By The Grace of God" our own mothers, sisters and wives could have turned to "the profession" had not other circumstances been sufficiently favorable for them.
If the shoe was on the other foot and you both agreed to raw and she gave "her word" that she was not afflicted with disease, but she knew she was and gave it to you and you gave it to your SO, look at what a tangled distorted mess we have, just because someone failed to "keep their word," or to honor and respect the other by telling the truth.
What I get here is a "revenge," a domination of another human being possibly as retaliation from an incident perpetrated upon this gentleman by a female for which he was prevented from retaliation at the time and now every woman must suffer his indignation.
It is also a mindset born many years ago that really is not so much shared on this board that "She is nothing but a whore, anyway."
On this board, we are gentlemen that derive much pleasure from these ladies and some of us treat them with great respect, fully knowing that "But By The Grace of God" our own mothers, sisters and wives could have turned to "the profession" had not other circumstances been sufficiently favorable for them.