Problem with a mixed board is the lady's, in most case, don't want to read about what they do or don't do.
Detailed specific act type of reviews, even IF from an "experienced whoremonger" have value, IF they provide as many specific details/facts as possible.
For example, suppose a review simply says "I got a BBBJ" when what really happened was the lady went down on the guy for a little while and as soon as she sensed he was ready, slipped on a condom and completed. Well, big difference as far as I'm concerned. The *fact* that the one guy said he "go a BBBJ" is useless as far as I'm concerned.
If the "experienced whoremonger" says "the lady bent over and I fucked her ass from behind (with a condom) and all the while she was moaning. The moaning was clearly faked and the lady was bored but I was able to shoot my load in her ass anyway", well, jaded or not I at least have the facts, even if some opinion is mixed in. I know the lady does Greek and she moans. Now I may or may not want to see her if she moans. I may or may not want to see her if *I* think the reviewer is trustworthy and *I* don't want to see a lady who "isn't into it", but that becomes up to me to judge. At least I know what she will and won't do. At least I *probably* won't be SHORTED ON SERVICES, which BTW, is what *I* think provokes the MOST negative responses/reviews of all.
fishfry said "If a girl is out the door in 20 minutes some guys will report that as a good experience". True, BUT if I KNOW she's out the door in 20 minutes I KNOW I ain't seeing her, no matter how good the john say she is.
In most reviews, fact and opinion are reasonably easy to determine. That's all I want to know. Opinion, for me, only counts when I know the reviewer and I have similar tastes.
Monk says he thinks JAG has a larger preponderance of bad reviews than elsewhere. Why do you suppose that is ? Think it's because the providers are not SUPPOSED to be there ? Which percentage of bad to good reviews more accurately reflects the truth ? JAG, or somewhere like TBD ? Frankly, due in large part to JAG, I would say my personal percentages in the past 2.5 years is roughly 5% bad, 15% mediocre, 20% good and 60% fantastic. The 20% bad and mediocre generally came from trying a lady "on the blind" or from a TBD review. The remaining 80% came from JAG reviews and the occasional TBD review/post. Now that's just my personal opinion and experiences. I'm willing to bet my personal percentages are WAY better than the general population.