Poll: Discriminatory practices of providers

What are your feelings on the discriminatory practices of providers based on race?

  • I think it's deplorable and I refuse to patronize anyone that I am aware of who practices this.

    Votes: 29 17.0%
  • I think it's deplorable, but I admit I will see them if they will see me.

    Votes: 10 5.8%
  • Although immoral there are instances in which I think it is acceptable or a necessary evil.

    Votes: 11 6.4%
  • I think it's deplorable, but a woman's right to choose is more important.

    Votes: 32 18.7%
  • I don't care, I just want to get laid.

    Votes: 34 19.9%
  • I think its acceptable and have no problem with it.

    Votes: 55 32.2%

  • Total voters
    171
#41
Originally posted by justlooking
Remind me, NYV:

Is this one of those situations where you'd think I was being patronizing if I said "great posts", or where you'd appreciate the support?

JL, my ATFSBWNTLPMBP

As I told you the last time we spoke in person, I find that when you say "What a great post" after every single "great post" someone makes, it is not only ass kissing, but it takes away the validity of that persons post. AND... it makes you look like an ass kisser.


Anyway, enough of that.

Thank you for the "great post" props. However, I did not say what I said to gain any kind of acceptance, or pats on the back.

I said it because it's how I feel.

I am viewing this entire situation as a bi racial/ black person, not only as a woman, and a prostitute.

Most of the prejudices I have faced in my short life have been because of my skin color, then about me being a woman.



Any who.....

Since I know you on a sort of personal level, I know that when you say something to ME, you say it because you mean it.

Thank you.

Now give me a smily face.....

and add some colors...
 
Last edited:
#42
The right of free association is inherent

to all human beings. Any escort has the right to turn away a
customer for ANY reason they choose. Isn't it wonderful
how these A-hole lawyers want to legislate control over
every facet of your life.
Many escorts,and i think it is great practice, will sit there
and talk to you for 10 mins to judge whether you are a
freakin idiot or whatever. If she decides it's no go, i have no
problem with it. And she doesn't have to give me a reason.
It' her inalienable right. Have you ever heard the term
"discriminating taste",it's a good thing, it'll keep you alive
and well. You discriminate in your life every day with every
purchase you make.
Of course the lawyers won't be satisfied until we are all
automatons. What did Shakespeare say about them?
 
#43
she genuinely clickswith her johns,where you admittedly treat them like tricks. So,who's the ho...ma?
ROTFLMAO , now that is funny for someone to say that has never had a session with me LOL LOL . Was that you peeking in my window ? and watching what I do with my dates ;)

DUHHHHHH lol that is why I am the best at what I do , I "click " VERY WELL with my clients that is why I choose whom I will see so I can "CLICK" lol too fucking funny !! thank you so much ! You made my day with that dumb founded post .......same ole peanut gallery playing the same tune LOL LOL LOL I can't stop LOL

Hi Amber :) yes you must be right as I see how some of the posters here are , guess what I sugested was such a bad thing ? , <hugs>

to MANY it is a huge turn on to throw some personality and good conversation and sometimes it is a huge turn on what is between the ears that makes the date the ultimate pleasure :) I am ROTFLMAO at some of the guys here that dont understand that some of us demand to be treated like ladies too, it always has worked wonders for me and I have had one hell of a great time and made lots of money and enjoy myself to the max at the same time wow what a concept lol I can't even throw a brick at some of you lol....hell you scream GIVE ME A GFE !! and when you get one do you act like a BFE to compleate the dream ? or do you just grudge fuck and go ? whats the point of a TRUE GFE ? , SOME GUYS DO UNDERSTAND THE TERM ... thank goodness :) again I do very well doing what I do and how I do it ,and I am having FUN at the same time :) I do undersatnd after how dare I list my prefrences and the same ole guys try to bash me over and over guess you will always have negitive things to say to me ....LOL so fucking what ? I dont care , it just makes me stronger lol and it just shows how it is here simple as that lol now after reading more of this board now I understand C9's cartoons and they are very cool , at that time I thought he was just picking on me alone ...my bad opps

nite nite all

the only posters that seem to ALWAYS dissagree is the same ole "CLICK" here that sit 24/7 in frount of this screen ....what a life am I jelious ? .....NOT lol

you guys are pretty fun and provide enertainment for me thanks xoxo
Foxybox
 
#44
my line of work makes me take many types of classes. a lot of these deal with sexual harrassment. the latest one i took was a diversity training class. i deal with all manners of the public every day, and my most important job function is to make the customer happy(if you can't tell i work in retail). however , escorts are involved in a highly personal industry and i cannot fault them if they turn away potential customers because of personal reasons. you may not agree with these reasons, but it is not your body. leagalization of prostitution may be a great idea but once the government starts regulating it, it may not be such a good idea after all.
 
#48
Originally posted by eros701
Too bad we don't know the racial makeup of this board. I'm sure the white guys have less problem seeing a discriminating provider than anyone else. Except for those AMP's that only admit Asians. That's just wrong.
I am white and have no problems with Asians seeing only Asians or providers seeing who they are comfortable with. This is just too personal a business -- they aren't selling plumbing supplies (well, one could argue). And it's a luxury item. No guns or butter here.
 
#49
Originally posted by justme
Most of the posts on this page are in response to Daddycool's post at the bottom of the previous page which only claimed 'businesses' could discriminate indiscrimantly.
A business with less than 15 and people are not held to any government regulation. You can hire all (15) men, all one race if you wish, a mix if you wish, all women. etc. Of course At+t or any fortune 100 or 500 company cannnot. But an escort is one person. Therefore would fall into this catagory. IMHO. Someone brought up civil rights, since when did we take away the right for a women to do what she wants with her body? We are not taking about not getting hired or fired because of race here. If she doesn't want to see someone whether it be to any race, color or creed, its her choice. She doesn't have to except your money just cause she is an escort.
 
#50
Originally posted by justme
Define 'right' because if you mean 'legal right' you're wrong.

(If you mean 'ethical right', you're probably wrong, too, but let's start with the easy cases first)
And what ethical right are you referring to. I just want to be clear we would be talking on the same page here. Do you mean the treating of morals? Ethics in our gonernment or our business? Because of you wish to talk about Enron, Anderson consulting and any other business with those types of ethics be my guest. But if you wish to talk about why a business should be forced to hire a protected group we can do that to, but you might find we might agree on that.
 

Wwanderer

Kids, don't try this at home
#51
Originally posted by Daddycool
A business with less than 15 and people are not held to any government regulation.
Italics added.

I believe this applies only to Federal government regulations and only if the business is not explicitly engaged in some sort of interstate commerce. However, such small businesses are still subject to state and local regulations (for example, a small restaurant emplying less than 15 people is still subject to local Health Board regs), including antidiscriminatory ones in some places.

-Ww
 
#52
Why is it that as soon as somebody mentions "ethics", some people start whining about people being "forced" to do something (or, God forbid, lawyers taking over everyone's life)?

Don't people ever just think about what's right and wrong? Don't they try in their lives to do what's right (as opposed to just what's legal)?

I mean, shit, when people disagree with manegerial decisions in the sports threads, nobody complains that anybody is trying to "force" the manager to do anything. They're just opining. Like here.
 
Last edited:

Wwanderer

Kids, don't try this at home
#53
Originally posted by justlooking
Why is it that as soon as somebody mentions "ethics", some people start whining about people being "forced" to do something (or, God forbid, lawyers taking over everyone's life)?
In part it is because a lot of people don't like lawyers.

-Ww
 
#54
Originally posted by justlooking
Why is it that as soon as somebody mentions "ethics", some people start whining about people being "forced" to do something (or, God forbid, lawyers taking over everyone's life)?

Don't people ever just think about what's right and wrong? Don't they try in their lives to do what's right (as opposed to just what's legal)?

I mean, shit, when people disagree with manegerial decisions in the sports threads, nobody complains that anybody is trying to "force" the manager to do anything. They're just opining. Like here.
Its because they are. I mean I am sure you know all about the hiring and firing process you have to go through so someone doesn't say they were fired because of race. God forbid it might be about them not doing their job.
 
#55
What that says to me is that you don't see anything wrong with racism (no big deal -- that's your call). You can't even discuss it as an issue (again, no big deal).

Because what does your last post have to do with whether it's right or wrong (NOT WHETHER IT IS OR SHOULD BE LEGAL OR ILLEGAL) for prostitutes to discriminate according to race? Nothing.
 
Last edited:
#56
Originally posted by Daddycool
Its because they are. I mean I am sure you know all about the hiring and firing process you have to go through so someone doesn't say they were fired because of race. God forbid it might be about them not doing their job.
A few months ago, my company went through a downsizing. They laid off this one lady (been with the company for many years and thus fairly highly compensated), but because of her age, the company was so afraid that it might get hit with an age discrimination suit, they covered themselves by laying off the entire department she worked in.
 
#57
Originally posted by justlooking
What that says to me is that you don't see anything wrong with racism (no big deal -- that's your call). You can't even discuss it as an issue (again, no big deal).

Because what does your last post have to do with whether it's right or wrong (NOT WHETHER IT IS OR SHOULD BE LEGAL OR ILLEGAL) for prostitutes to discriminate according to race? Nothing.
Let me be more clear. I was responding to the point of company's and the process they have to go through to fire someone or hire someone. They cannot just hire the best person for the job whoever that might be. (man women black white etc.)
 
#58
Because what does your last post have to do with whether it's right or wrong (NOT WHETHER IT IS OR SHOULD BE LEGAL OR ILLEGAL) for prostitutes to discriminate according to race? Nothing.


Now let me answer your question. I think a woman has the choice to see who ever she wants for whatever reasons. We choose who we want to see. Or do you pick the ugly fat chicks so you won't be called a person who doesn't see beautifully-challenged people.

You don't think the escort should be able to call off the date. Maybe the client smells, maybe he is 15 inches, maybe its becasue he is white,black,asian,korean or spanish, maybe its because he has a pimple the size of finger nail on his face, maybe he is packing a gun or knife or maybe she is just plain not attracted to him. There are Asian only place's and I don't make a big deal that they will only serivce Asians. DO I agree? no, I'd like to go to those places and see those women but it is their choice who they see.
 
#59
Originally posted by jseah
A few months ago, my company went through a downsizing. They laid off this one lady (been with the company for many years and thus fairly highly compensated), but because of her age, the company was so afraid that it might get hit with an age discrimination suit, they covered themselves by laying off the entire department she worked in.
This is the exact point I was trying to make about company's and what they feel they need to do.
 

justme

homo economicus
#60
Originally posted by Daddycool
A business with less than 15 and people are not held to any government regulation.
You are telling me that a law firm, say, with fewer than 15 employees can openly and legally have a policy of not hiring African Americans? That if an African American applies for an advertised job as an associate, that the partners of the firm can tell him, "No, we aren't going to hire you because you are an African American," without any fear of recourse from regulatory bodies?

Is this truly what you are telling me?
 
Top