OK, so you asked for it....

O

Ozzy

#41
#41
popeye....


who said i like anything skinny? i like my brazilians but the ones i like aren't what i'd call skinny.....unless J-lo is considered skinny. back to you question... these porn stars are more PSE than most of the brazilians or mosdt of the other popular girls on the boards. most of the girls don't do greek or swallow (or even spit) as 1eye pointed out about ryan conner, and the others i listed with her pretty much supply the same services. now i don't know if all those services are available with the second batch i listed (nicci, sky jenna), just that i've heard very good things about them as well.



but.... i've had better rides with $200 brazilians and an argetinian girl i met at a quickie joint off roosevelt and later at wylies in jackson hts where she danced. hooked up with her a few times at 200-300 for the night after she got off work. would go to one of the airport motels from 4am till 10am-noon.


look...anything over the 500 or 600 mark is pretty much the same (ie shannon) as whats at 1000 as far as looks go (service always varies at any price).... the extra 400 is what i like to call "for the head" (that's the big head)...... if you know what i mean.
 
P

popeye

#42
#42
okay....

Ozz,

Excuse my presumptions, but I based the skinny comment on a recommendation you made a while back to the poster who was seeking waif-like providers. You made some recommendations, which made me presume you had similar tastes. I guess I was wrong. J-lo is definitely not on the skinny waif side of a woman’s physique. As a matter of fact although I like the Mrs. C type for an Escort, I tend to date the J-lo types. Go figure…. I guess I saw the movie the Graduate one too many times.

Thanks for the response and I do stand corrected.

Regards

POP
 
Last edited by a moderator:
O

Ozzy

#43
#43
no problem popeye....


most of the brazilians from team brazil were very waif like (giselle, adriana and luana), only gabriela was on the J-Lo side of the scale. although there was this other brazilian whom i just posted about in the niki thread on this board who is somewhat on the J-Lo side as well........ Caterina.
 
M

mydesign

#44
#44
Originally posted by Ozzy


but.... i've had better rides with $200 brazilians and an argetinian girl i met at a quickie joint off roosevelt and later at wylies in jackson hts where she danced. hooked up with her a few times at 200-300 for the night after she got off work. would go to one of the airport motels from 4am till 10am-noon.
Click to expand...

Ozzy,

please don't tell me you broke your own rule about comparisons with the lo-end.
 
O

Ozzy

#45
#45
not quite the same...


i didn't get that great ride at the quickie joint, it was when i later hooked up with her a few months later (when she was dancing) that i got the great rides. i never said great times with good looking girls couldn't be found at the low end (you can find them anywhere).... it's just that they're few and far between. the argument that has been posed is that on a whole, there is no difference between low and high end, when that just isn't the case.

i've mentioned this arentinian dancer several times on jag as a great example of what could be found at the low end (like finding a treasure at a garage sale).... they are definitely out there but they are rare, and that dancer is one of the very few great ones i've found at the low end..... and i've done more than my share of slumming in my day.
 
Last edited:
J

justlooking

#46
#46
More Stupid Metadiscussion

I don't see "the rule" as being you can't compare particular so-called "high end" prostitutes whom you've seen to particular so-called "low-end" prostitutes whom you've seen. Or even that you can't say about a so-called "high-end" prostitute whom you've seen, "you can do better for much less."

As I understand it, what you can't do is butt in and comment, without having seen the woman in question, "Nobody can be worth $XXX." That's the kind of shit I take it this board was created to avoid.
 
Last edited:
Slinky Bender

Slinky Bender

The All Powerful Moderator
#47
#47
I have to agree with that. For example, if we were talking about "Jane Jacobs", and someone had seen both her and "Paula Pickett" ( yes, actually seen both of them ) and said "I've seen both, and they look like identical twins, talk like identical twins, and fuck like identical twins; but Paula is only $250", I can't imagine we'd want to ban such discusssion.
 
J

justlooking

#48
#48
Or even, "I can't really justify having paid $600 to see Jane Jacobs when I had a much better time with Louise Mumford for $250 a week earlier."

The problem arises (to make sure this dead horse is fully beaten) when someone who's never seen Jane Jacobs feels the need to pipe in and say, "She can't possibly be worth $600, when I've had good times at Julie's/April's/Episode/My Bathroom for so much less."
 
Last edited:
C

capitan

#49
#49
line in the sand

After reading the comments suggested so far in this thread, it
seems to me that placing a dollar mark on high end is a very difficult thing to do with any consistancy.

I would suggest that most of this has to do with one's "relative
view" of just what is worth what. Oh man... I've really opened up
a can of worms.

But that is my point...it is all relative...and hence, cannot be
absolutely defined or described.

This even applies to a given provider and client. A client may "rate" a girl on a given day as worth $500 or more for an hour,
but at a latter time...days or weeks...that same client may feel
that the provider described, isn't worth the $500 as stated before.

This seems to be the nature of the human mind...a very complicated and almost endless issue. The sexual conquest and
satisfaction of the human mind is almost infinite. And I think, that
because of this, the idea of placing a "dollar value" on service and
or physical appearance, is just not in any real sense, something
that can be done with any concrete definition.

Where do we draw the line in the sand? $400, $500, $1000...
it's all relative to how deep our pockets are, and our needs at the time.
 
Last edited:
J

justlooking

#50
#50
No No No No No No No No No

The problem people are having here, I think, is that they're taking the title "high end" as some kind of qualitative judgment (i.e., that this is supposed to be a board to discuss prostitutes who are really good, or really worth it, or something). As I understand it, that's not the point at all. The point is only to discuss prostitutes who are more expensive than those discussed on the other boards here -- without (here's that dead horse rearing its bloodied head again) having the discussions derailed by constant complaints that the prices are too high as a matter of principle.

So "relative value", "how you feel this week as opposed to last week", "whether she's worth it", all that stuff, are irrelevant as benchmarks for whether a particular prostitute is appropriate for discussion on this board. (They're all relevant to individual reviews -- the whole point of the board would be to discuss which so-called "high end" prostitutes are worth their fees.) As others have already said, the benchmark for discussion here should be a simple dollar amount.

(Maybe slinkybender shouldn't have called this board "The High End Room". Maybe everybody would have gotten it better if he had just called it "Expensive Thrills".)
 
Last edited:
Slinky Bender

Slinky Bender

The All Powerful Moderator
#51
#51
Or maybe I should have hung a velvet rope outside and based on how expensive the shoes are of those who wish to enter simply said "sorry....private party".

But, just for clarity's sake, the true point of this section of UG is "to discuss prostitutes who are more expensive than those discussed on the other boards here -- without having the discussions derailed by constant complaints that the prices are too high as a matter of principle".
 
O

Ozzy

#52
#52
Originally posted by slinkybender
Or maybe I should have hung a velvet rope outside and based on how expensive the shoes are of those who wish to enter simply said "sorry....private party".
Click to expand...
who are you? .................. magic johnson
 
M

mydesign

#54
#54
Originally posted by justlooking
The problem arises (to make sure this dead horse is fully beaten) when someone who's never seen Jane Jacobs feels the need to pipe in and say, "She can't possibly be worth $600, when I've had good times at Julie's/April's/Episode/My Bathroom for so much less."
Click to expand...
How much does your bathroom charge? how many cups? Does it offer bbbj? bbfs? greek? What's the number and website?
 
S

SkellyChamp

#55
#55
It's amazing that this discussion has gotten to 53 okay now 54 posts.

There is nothing relative as to the parameters of what is seeking to be set here. "High end" is simply a matter of price per hour charged, not relative worth. Relative worth will be discussed but vis a vis the woman who charges that line in the sand, bottom line magic dollar figure.
 
C

capitan

#56
#56
the bottom line

Gentlemen,

Let me emphatically state, that it is ALL MIND CONTROL.

It ALL depends on what YOU want and when YOU want it...who cares what some one else likes. Your spending YOUR dollars to
satisfy YOU, or get YOU off. But always remember...your desires are a product of your brain. This basic concept somehow seems to evade many. The bottom line is this: it's ALL IN YOUR HEAD.

That's why it's so RELATIVE. Everyone's brain/mind, has different and unique desires. What turns YOU on, may be entirely different
from what turns someone else on.

So the concept of placing a dollar value on provider performance
and/or physical appearance, is ENTIRELY MENTAL. And this is very subjective from client to client. It simply is: WHAT YOU WANT WHEN YOU WANT IT. And this will change within the SAME client with the passage of time.

As I said in my opening remarks, the human mind/brain, is in TOTAL control of our actions...sexual or otherwise. Everything we have ever done or experienced, or will do, or experience, is
directed and dictated by our mind/brain.

When it comes to sexual drive and/or desire, this is absoutely true. The mind/brain is the final dictator of what will be required
for you to be "satisfied". The body and sexual organs only go along for the ride. It may be a fantasic ride...but the brain always needs to be satisfied in the final end. The human brain/mind, is, what I will call, a device or mechanism, that is infinitely complicated.

Many books and volumes have been written about this. But the
BOTTOM LINE is this: your sexual cravings and satisfaction, can ONLY be satisfied, when you brain/mind is satisfied.
 
Last edited:
J

justlooking

#57
#57
THAT'S ALL VERY NICE.

BUT IT HAS NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH THE SUBJECT OF SETTING THE PARAMETERS OF THIS BOARD.

(UNLESS YOU'RE SAYING I CAN USE "MIND CONTROL" TO GET AGENCIES TO CHANGE THEIR FEES.)
 
Last edited:
S

SkellyChamp

#59
#59
Originally posted by justlooking
THAT'S ALL VERY NICE.

BUT IT HAS NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH THE SUBJECT OF SETTING THE PARAMETERS OF THIS BOARD.

(UNLESS YOU'RE SAYING I CAN USE "MIND CONTROL" TO GET AGENCIES TO CHANGE THEIR FEES.)
Click to expand...
Shouting JL - Can't say I blame you. Difficult to talk at cross purposes.
 
G

Geezy Muldoon

Gold
#60
#60
(Judge Crater now levitating some thirty odd high priced agency girls naked kicking and screaming out of the bathroom windows of their Manhattan apartments before the 7 pm shift starts. Pulling some of them, in fact, right off their toilet seats sans makeup. Making them hurdle through the air flying end over end with tampon strings trailing behind them to an empty conference room in my skyscraper. In their disoriented state, I will fuck each and every one of them for free and fly them back through Times Square at about 10 tonight. With any luck, I might even come more than twice. (Sniff.))
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top