WSB,
i've been making fun of Candi's aspiring to melodrama but achieving farce instead, because i think it's the wisest response to such cases, on balance. at one time, i relegated you to the same status. your present conduct on this board may suggest you harbor a certain nostalgia for those days.
my problem is not with Candi, per se; rather, it's your conduct here with Val and now with Ozzy; and, secondarily, your whining about your posts being deleted. if your posts are being deleted more than mine, that alone should give you pause for thought.
i don't in any way, shape, or form see A1N and Candi as "co-conspirators". if you think i wrote something that constititues an "admission" of such, please specify where i did so, in order that i might promptly edit or delete it. if you cannot do so, it is yet another demonstration that, though you may mean well, you are quite often mistaken even about what's 'between the four corners of the document', never mind elsewhere.
A1N is the only escort, before or since, who has ever succeeded in making herself an exception to what you characterize as my "normal overzealous defense of current and former providers". by itself, that fact should be considered by anyone 'just tuning in'. (did you ever take her up on her repeated offers to you of her "homebaked lasagna"?
)
you have written an utterly irrational version of events involving Candi and UG. you have included some nastiness about some of the people here. i have written a point by point response that reveals same.
for you to now respond that you will not reply to my "irrationality" is tantamount to 'default'.
as you well know, i have always maintained that you mean well, but are the type of the 'brawler', however learned and civilized you also happen to be. but, presumed conscious good intentions nothwithstanding, there is still room for legitimate concern re: why this brawl, in this bar, with this particular manager and two of his 'best customers'?
to say that you are doing the 'honorable' thing begs this more fundamental question: why this (supposedly) honorable thing, at this time, and this place?
[Edited by guy catelli on 02-26-2001 at 10:19 AM]
i've been making fun of Candi's aspiring to melodrama but achieving farce instead, because i think it's the wisest response to such cases, on balance. at one time, i relegated you to the same status. your present conduct on this board may suggest you harbor a certain nostalgia for those days.
my problem is not with Candi, per se; rather, it's your conduct here with Val and now with Ozzy; and, secondarily, your whining about your posts being deleted. if your posts are being deleted more than mine, that alone should give you pause for thought.
i don't in any way, shape, or form see A1N and Candi as "co-conspirators". if you think i wrote something that constititues an "admission" of such, please specify where i did so, in order that i might promptly edit or delete it. if you cannot do so, it is yet another demonstration that, though you may mean well, you are quite often mistaken even about what's 'between the four corners of the document', never mind elsewhere.
A1N is the only escort, before or since, who has ever succeeded in making herself an exception to what you characterize as my "normal overzealous defense of current and former providers". by itself, that fact should be considered by anyone 'just tuning in'. (did you ever take her up on her repeated offers to you of her "homebaked lasagna"?
)you have written an utterly irrational version of events involving Candi and UG. you have included some nastiness about some of the people here. i have written a point by point response that reveals same.
for you to now respond that you will not reply to my "irrationality" is tantamount to 'default'.
as you well know, i have always maintained that you mean well, but are the type of the 'brawler', however learned and civilized you also happen to be. but, presumed conscious good intentions nothwithstanding, there is still room for legitimate concern re: why this brawl, in this bar, with this particular manager and two of his 'best customers'?
to say that you are doing the 'honorable' thing begs this more fundamental question: why this (supposedly) honorable thing, at this time, and this place?
[Edited by guy catelli on 02-26-2001 at 10:19 AM]