Originally Posted by EddyBearNY View Post
"Lamont - Back in the mid 80's I spent a lot of time on the SW hunt. Every night, all weekend, and holidays! Whenever I was not working, I was scoring SW's. For the amount of time I spent hunting down these sleaze bag hoes, it is not surprising"
As anyone who's familiar with the Flushing Street Walker's thread knows, I have been quite perplexed by the sentiments expressed by EddyBearNY towards the women who regular provide him with sexual services. As a woman who has engaged in p4p situations herself (both sides of the transaction), I of course find the use of derrogatory phrases like "sleaze bag hoes" within this context to be very offensive - but that's not even what really interests or concerns me at this point; I'm beyond that. I realize that some of you guys, armed with the anonymity and lack of face to face confrontation provided by the internet, are going to sit behind your computers and shamelessly cast stones sometimes. But, I digress.
This is what I REALLY want to know, EddyBear. (and everyone else out there who gives a shit about any of this):
Who is worse (or better) here? The sleaze bag ho herself, or the people who continually create a market for the services which, upon their deliverance to you, cause you to label her a sleaze bag ho? Does it really matter which end of the transaction you're on? Are you not both dancing the same fucking dance?
"Lamont - Back in the mid 80's I spent a lot of time on the SW hunt. Every night, all weekend, and holidays! Whenever I was not working, I was scoring SW's. For the amount of time I spent hunting down these sleaze bag hoes, it is not surprising"
As anyone who's familiar with the Flushing Street Walker's thread knows, I have been quite perplexed by the sentiments expressed by EddyBearNY towards the women who regular provide him with sexual services. As a woman who has engaged in p4p situations herself (both sides of the transaction), I of course find the use of derrogatory phrases like "sleaze bag hoes" within this context to be very offensive - but that's not even what really interests or concerns me at this point; I'm beyond that. I realize that some of you guys, armed with the anonymity and lack of face to face confrontation provided by the internet, are going to sit behind your computers and shamelessly cast stones sometimes. But, I digress.
This is what I REALLY want to know, EddyBear. (and everyone else out there who gives a shit about any of this):
Who is worse (or better) here? The sleaze bag ho herself, or the people who continually create a market for the services which, upon their deliverance to you, cause you to label her a sleaze bag ho? Does it really matter which end of the transaction you're on? Are you not both dancing the same fucking dance?