I totally disagree with some things you've said and I can clear up others.
I told him not to comment. Believe me, he wanted to. And now he is free to do so because that furor has died down and she probably couldn't find this thread even if she wanted to. (If she did, though, would that be proof that one of the scumbags here led her to it? After all, she claims she found the site by googling her number and her number won't lead her to here.) Anyway, I thought that having those two battle directly would not end well.
Plus, since I was privy to the whole affair, I felt fully qualified to comment for him. Why? Because he texted me when the post was up and said he had just met her and done a car date, She can deny it all she wants - and she has - but the scenario he laid out for me in that text made perfect sense. He subsequently texted me about a second date. He didn't say in the text where he took her. As for the obscuring aspect, that was an assumption on my part that it could account for the hotel discrepancy.
We discussed the problem that providers can identify you with too many details a long time ago when Heather of a thousand names caught me by surprise by appearing in the same hotel room as another provider I was seeing, the little blonde. I had posted a review with some negatives about Heather about a month before that and detailed that I visited with her at a friend's apartment. Because I included that detail, she was able to place my face to the review and she started shit with me at this date. Fortunately for me, the need for her GF to earn money outweighed her desire to continue berating me and so the date went on. But for me it was a lesson learned. Either leave out the details or obscure them. Wiggs and I talked about that, so I assumed that is what Wiggs did with Lucinda. But, again, he could tell you.
Also, Wiggs mentioned in that first text that she was a blonde and went on to describe her looks and age and then added that she told him she started stripping young. You will recall that someone else in her thread echoed that later. In the text about the second date, he made a comment that she loved talking about her younger days but he didn't make it sound as bad as it looked in the review that appears here. But even that echoes what some other guy said and it certainly echoes what she showed us.
And he did say that she wanted to stay UTR and so he knew the risk in reviewing her. And that is where I differ with you. I appreciate that he showed an allegiance to the board by doing that and I firmly believe that qualifies as a TOFTT. No one else had reviewed her, though they did mention seeing her. So, I think it took balls because of the risk and we can see the result right here. Because not only did he suffer her wrath but he now has your criticism leveled at him. Furthermore, I believe it goes against the spirit of the board to encourage members not to review girls if they ask that. And I do believe that at least some of the UG mods will agree with me. I think this falls in line with what Slinky and Waterclone have gone on record as saying. I'm not sure how lightweight would weigh in - pun intended - on this and unbeknownst to most of you, there are two other mods on the crew that I have no idea of their position on matters like this.
My disagreement with you would also extend to his being a bit of a dick for the same reasons that I think he should be applauded. He stepped up and reviewed her, which is the purpose of this board. And I'm not saying this because I'm friends with the guy. I would say it about anyone else here and I have certainly complimented other members for what they have said and done.
The bottom line is that we saw enough of her behavior for everyone to make their own judgement. She rambled on after saying she was done. She rambled on after I stopped when she made the "last word" comment. She changed her story. She never answered me about why she didn't take issue with Mord for starting the thread and posting her number and Mr. Joyboy for posting her photo. And please understand me, guys, I mean no criticism for saying that now or in her thread. It was merely a comparison. I see no wrong in what you two guys did either. She also flat out disparaged everyone here on this site with her comments about the board in general and extended it all the way even to the guy who made the board software. She fired away here with a scatter gun in the end. But initially, her venom was at Wiggs and then me as I took the heat.
In fairness to her, I could see her confusion if the date did not happen at the motel. But she could easily have asked for her phone number and photo to be removed either in the thread, nicely, from the start or even in a report. I've always been fair to providers in allowing them to refute posts by approving them and putting them through. And maybe that's how I wind up in these messes to begin with. This wasn't my first rodeo. You've seen me go at with many providers in here that I think were proven wrong. And if you don't believe me, ask Carlito. So what went down with Lucinda had nothing to do with Wiggs as far as my doing anything different. The only factor that differed was that this time I had privy info.