I hope this may find favor because it has always been an interesting topic to me.
I have found, through personal experience and observation, that it is NOT the prettiest women or the most profound, or even the most clever that command the highest prices for their services.
It's the women who can take advantage of those age old marketing techniques of location, location, location, and creating an aurora of cache.
Men paying the long green for sexual services hope that their money purchases them a unique experience, several levels above what might be found for $250/hr on Back Page or any number of agencies and independent "webscorts". It might be argued that when this slice of the market is taken as a whole that could be true, but on an individual basis what is at play more than perception?
I think it has to be looked at, and perhaps given cr****ce, that what makes the difference, on average, between a $250/hr provider and a $1000/hr provider is how good she is at convincing her potential clients that she is a $1000/hr provider, and not much else.
I mean everything else being equal, looks at an acceptable level and the ability to converse in a way that doesn't make the client want to puncture his ear drums, what else is there other than standard or exceptional marketing that makes the difference?
Now this is NOT to turn into a discussion about whether its worth it to pay one level of money over the other... NOT, NOT, NOT... and I will moderate along those lines.
It is a discussion about how much marketing makes the difference on the supply side and how providers in the field find themselves situation on any given level, or move [as I find is frequently the case] between them. Sometimes even operating concurrently on multiple levels.
The floor is open.
I have found, through personal experience and observation, that it is NOT the prettiest women or the most profound, or even the most clever that command the highest prices for their services.
It's the women who can take advantage of those age old marketing techniques of location, location, location, and creating an aurora of cache.
Men paying the long green for sexual services hope that their money purchases them a unique experience, several levels above what might be found for $250/hr on Back Page or any number of agencies and independent "webscorts". It might be argued that when this slice of the market is taken as a whole that could be true, but on an individual basis what is at play more than perception?
I think it has to be looked at, and perhaps given cr****ce, that what makes the difference, on average, between a $250/hr provider and a $1000/hr provider is how good she is at convincing her potential clients that she is a $1000/hr provider, and not much else.
I mean everything else being equal, looks at an acceptable level and the ability to converse in a way that doesn't make the client want to puncture his ear drums, what else is there other than standard or exceptional marketing that makes the difference?
Now this is NOT to turn into a discussion about whether its worth it to pay one level of money over the other... NOT, NOT, NOT... and I will moderate along those lines.
It is a discussion about how much marketing makes the difference on the supply side and how providers in the field find themselves situation on any given level, or move [as I find is frequently the case] between them. Sometimes even operating concurrently on multiple levels.
The floor is open.