Oral Sex

#1
I have a question for all of you. I know my husband sees call girls. I am also fairly certain that he receives oral sex from them. However, when I try to perform it for him, he always tells me that "He is not comfortable doing that with me".

Why is it that a man would "feel comfortable" receiving it from a call girl, but not from his wife ? What is it that I am missing here ?
 

Carl M

Hanging by a thread
#2
Could be Technique sweets!

Could be many different variables- hand action, deep throating, too much teeth, too little or too much suction, not licking his balls, looking at him when your sucking etc!
 

Carl M

Hanging by a thread
#6
Tucker Very Amusing!

You are one funny MOT SOB!! Plain Jane if you give us your email we could teach you proper technique- hubbyl probably never will see a call girl again after we give you instruction! LOL
 
#7
wow, the APM's marketing powers are far-reaching...

Plain Jane, perhaps Ozzy is right; perhaps your beloved feels that it is beneath you, but, okay for pros.

Repeat after me: there is no such thing as a BAD blow job.
 
#8
i bet old hubby already has a date lined up with anal ashley.

btw pj.....

the world has to know.......did you find this site stored on honey's comuputer, or did you find it on your own looking for help.

but i am right (this time) he doesn't want *his* wife doing what *he* does with whores (sorry ladies). since i assume you never did it before with your husband. i don't think it's a matter of wether your good or not, since it's not something you can realy learn. for all he knows....maybe your a master, and just have some un-tapped talent...........if so, drop me a line.




:cool:
 
#9
You guys crack me up.

You fall all over yourselves trying to impress escorts with your most sensitive whore-board musings, yet you make condescending and insensitive remarks to a women who happens to be a non-provider asking a pretty legitimate and interesting question.

So much for "ladies" and "gentlemen".

Bisous,

WSB (who hopes you keep that butterfly flying my princess)
 
#10
EAT ME!

i gave her an honest answer.


an angel makes a wrong turn and winds up in hell.....

wadda you want to do, put out the flames ?

[Edited by Ozzy on 05-08-2001 at 06:54 PM]
 

Hotpuppy

Mr.Butterworth
#11
Originally posted by wsb


You fall all over yourselves trying to impress escorts with your most
sensitive whore-board musings, yet you make condescending and
insensitive remarks to a women who happens to be a non-provider
asking a pretty legitimate and interesting question.
__________________________________________________________________________
Why are we to assume that a) this is a woman b) "she" is a non-provider c) this is a
legitimate question?
When I first started posting, the board thought I was Kayla Kat fer chrissake!
As Oz quoted and Paul Vitti said: thats the mouth that kisses his children/
good enough answer in this situation.
I dont think I have ever posted a "whore-board" musing in order to impress an escort,
in fact I believe I have gotten in trouble with at least one escort who couldnt stand me
questioning her integrity.
Take care hp
BTW, the butterfly thing is sycophantic IMHO

[Edited by Hotpuppy on 05-08-2001 at 07:10 PM]
 

Slinky Bender

The All Powerful Moderator
#12
I have to side with WSB on this ( ouch ), although I do think Ozzy is ( somewhat ) correct in the sense that if he thinks it's something "dirty", he may feel uncomfortable doing it with a "loved one". As I alluded to in another thread recently, a lot of otherwise "straight" guys go to "call girls" ( side note to Jane: no one uses that term on these boards ) to explore what they consider "taboo" or "fetishistic" areas of their sexuality, since being with someone they know, let alone a wife, cam be very inhibiting to certain behaviours.

Ozzy,
" i bet old hubby already has a date lined up with anal ashley. "

That's entirely possible, since if a guy can't stand to have his wife blow him, odds are he isn't going to ask to put it in her ass.

"EAT ME!"

Isn't this redundant ? Didn't you already ask for that in an earlier post ? Now you're yelling for it ?
 
#13
HP --

So, you are saying that it's more logical to assume: (i) Plain Jane is a man [baby], (ii) she's a provider (which seems irrelevant), (iii) the post is just a rouse designed to what???

I suppose you could be correct about any or all of the foregoing, but those are pretty big assumptions from so little data and, in any event, it doesn't really explain the rudeness exhibited by those who seem to have a penchant for courting cyberscorts (although it may explain why they need to do so). Of course, in at least one case it may just be a lack of profit motive.

Ditto on the butterfly thing.

--WSB
 
#14
i don't remember asking anyone to eat me. "blow me" maybe, "fuck you" definitely.......but eat me? i don't think i used that one yet.


and yes, i should give credit to bobby D as paul vitti, in "analyze this" though i did change a word or two.
 

Hotpuppy

Mr.Butterworth
#15
WSB,
All I was trying to say and probably should have just said it was , that this post may( if I knew how to bolden this, I would) not be what it innocently appears to be.
You are correct that it does not explain the rudeness, though I dont see it so much as rudeness, rather having some fun at the expense of a civilian( if indeed...)
Im curious, if you agree that the butterfly thing is sycophantic, why sign off with it?
Take care HP
 

justme

homo economicus
#16
Hey Oz, don't be so sensitive. I don't see anywhere in WSB's post where he refers to your response in particular. I do agree that for the most part the tone of these replies have been at best insensitive.

Topicallity: I think this question is far more topical than baseball, WW2, Sopranos, or rock and roll. This woman ostensibly has a very legitamate question which many people here have the expertise to answer. Would you have her post the question on a recent divorce website?

Legitimacy: To assume that this person is baiting us seems a bit premature at this point. I know that I have answered questions seriously that I suspected may have been asked in bad faith.

Answer: Sorry, PJ, I got none. Although some variant of Oz's suggestion seems like it could be likely.

Agreement: Not only do I agree with WSB's assesment that the tone of response has been negative, but I also agree that this behavior is perverse when taken as a body with all the fluffball trading that some of the respondants have made a practice of making. In a somewhat heated discussion I had with Val in the early days of UG, I took a little shit for responding to her far less offensively than some of you have responded to this woman.
 
#17
i don't think i spoke any differently to PJ than i do/did to most providers. sure some i'm a little more friendly with than others, and i've attacked more than one or two a lot worse than anything i've said here.....a lot.

if anything i was busting on her hubby for (1) getting caught this time, (2) getting caught once before or (3) admitting to it.


as far as val goes......in *HER* opinion, you disrespected her. i've used the words that you used on public boards......used them here on UG but i never used them in a discussion with someone like her because i know they're gonna set her off. she's not here and if anyone else had a problem with me using it, then i'd probably apologize to her/them if it meant that much to them. it's no big deal.


:cool:

[Edited by Ozzy on 05-08-2001 at 11:19 PM]
 
#18
regardless of whether one thinks this is a legitimate question by a legitimate person or not i think it makes for an interesting topic for discussion. in the eyes of some gentlemen there are "good girls" and then there are "bad girls". we marry the good girls because we need them to bear our children, be our wives, and be our life mate. stereotypically speaking, there are things that good girls do and then there are some other things that bad girls do. a husband(ok some of them) does not want to be married to a bad girl and so he will reject any bad girl tendencies by her. (if you get my drift)

as far as the insensitivity of some of these posts are concerned. i agree. i think that some are rude and disrespectful and thinly veiled as attempts at humor and "harmless" fun. there is an underlying current of visciousness with alot of this stuff. and it's not just this thread. it's evident in other threads both here and on other boards as well. we want the ladies to treat us like gentlemen and with respect and yet some act like a bunch of high school children in a boys locker room.

funny how the folks who make rude posts themselves never think that their posts are in fact....well.....rude.
 
#19
everything i post is rude. when did i change.


you should catch me on a guys only boards like jag........we at least it's supposed to be guys only.



[Edited by Ozzy on 05-08-2001 at 11:52 PM]
 
Top