Open season for college girls on SA (or tall tales from doughy nerds)

My current month’s membership on SA just expired, and lo and behold, I get a bunch of replies from girls I messaged throughout the month, but who had not responded (or even read my messages) now. I’m wondering whether SA offers some kind of incentive to these girls to reach out to guys whose accounts recently expire in the hope that the guys will renew so that they can read the messages.

Has this happened to anyone else? It seems likely because they advertise “diamond” membership as getting 20x more responses than regular members, so I wonder if they throttle messages to girls and the girls sometimes don’t get them till much later.

In terms of success rate this month - I talked to a number of girls but many were just nuts with their ppm asks or wanted to sell pics and promise “just this one sale and no more sugaring till we meet” (I’ve reviewed them here) or agreed to meet and then just stop responding to text messages. So I did not actually meet with anyone from the site this month - what a waste.

A couple of final reviews for the month here:
$Al$m$ira$ - Darien / 23. Looks good, started texting right away, great pics, then just stopped responding on the day of each of three meets we had set up. Each time with a dumb excuse …. E.g., My phone died (I have it plugged in now, that’s how I’m able to text you now…..)

$P$rett$y$fac$e$4L$$ - 32 / Jersey City. Reached out to her on SA, she writes back after I’d logged off. The next day, I have a slew of messages from her essentially going berserk because I left her messages “on seen”, which I take means unread. She blocked me. Probably all for the best.
 
If you want to split hairs one of the main arguments of
veganism is that animals can't give you their consent to eat them.

Depending on how you look at it even cannibalism could be
considered vegan if the human consented to the eating.

As for swallowing - it would have my full consent!
So swallowing should be considered 100% vegan!
 
Bit yet she’s eating meat for a living go figure smh.
My current month’s membership on SA just expired, and lo and behold, I get a bunch of replies from girls I messaged throughout the month, but who had not responded (or even read my messages) now. I’m wondering whether SA offers some kind of incentive to these girls to reach out to guys whose accounts recently expire in the hope that the guys will renew so that they can read the messages.

Has this happened to anyone else? It seems likely because they advertise “diamond” membership as getting 20x more responses than regular members, so I wonder if they throttle messages to girls and the girls sometimes don’t get them till much later.

In terms of success rate this month - I talked to a number of girls but many were just nuts with their ppm asks or wanted to sell pics and promise “just this one sale and no more sugaring till we meet” (I’ve reviewed them here) or agreed to meet and then just stop responding to text messages. So I did not actually meet with anyone from the site this month - what a waste.

A couple of final reviews for the month here:
$Al$m$ira$ - Darien / 23. Looks good, started texting right away, great pics, then just stopped responding on the day of each of three meets we had set up. Each time with a dumb excuse …. E.g., My phone died (I have it plugged in now, that’s how I’m able to text you now…..)

$P$rett$y$fac$e$4L$$ - 32 / Jersey City. Reached out to her on SA, she writes back after I’d logged off. The next day, I have a slew of messages from her essentially going berserk because I left her messages “on seen”, which I take means unread. She blocked me. Probably all for the best.
Al$m$ira location comes up as unknown. That to me makes me believe she is not in the USA . But I can't be 100% sure on that,
 
Forgot to mention $Ne$lly$ white plains. Wants 500 all covered. She wouldn’t budge on the ppm. I almost pulled the trigger but the pics she sent off site were not as good as the ones on the site so I passed.
 
Do not post hyperlinks
I have been hitting SB hard and have a bunch of open conversations.

Seems even scammier than usual- didn't think that was possible - but
I guess it is.

Here is a sample - all S

$Andi1248$ - Trenton - athletic but seems to have some - attitude ghosted after some back/forth

$Oceansidee$ - Philly - super cute but won't stop with the cash requests before meeting IRL

$C_13$ - West Deptford - already posted on her. cash and dash girl

MOD NOTE: NAMES WITH HYPERLINKS DELETED
 
I have been hitting SB hard and have a bunch of open conversations.

Seems even scammier than usual- didn't think that was possible - but
I guess it is.

Here is a sample - all S

$Andi1248$ - Trenton - athletic but seems to have some - attitude ghosted after some back/forth

$Oceansidee$ - Philly - super cute but won't stop with the cash requests before meeting IRL

$C_13$ - West Deptford - already posted on her. cash and dash girl

MOD NOTE: NAMES WITH HYPERLINKS DELETED
Oops got a bit too much on the cut and paste was not intentional.
 
As things turned out live events got intense and I was never able to make much good use out of joining SDM a few months back and all all intense and purposes I just left it lapse. I'm hoping in Aug to give it a shot again now that I think I'll have more time and sanity. I do have a question though.

Seems to me that when I first joined SDM if showed relative login information as SA does like letting you know a SB has say logged on that day. And at some point, that feature seems to have disappeared? Is this an option I accidentally turned off? Or did SDM remove that capability? IIRC it shows a green dot when a SB is online, but that's the only such capability I could see when my account was no longer paid. It would be helpful to know if I'm message a SB who hasn't logged on in 3 years or if it's worth following up on somebody whose logging in but not responding to messages vs not responding because they haven't logged on yet.
 
SB shows you when someone has last logged in or if they are online. My strategy is generally sheer numbers - so if they have recently logged in I will roll the dice but not necessarily expect a quick response. 3 years might be too extreme but 3 days to a week could still be a potential match. Can't nickel and dime on your credits sometimes you have to waste them chasing iffy accounts.
 
SDM you can not see when they last logged on, you can only see a tiny green circle that means online now, but doesn't matter anyways, you can message unlimited there so just send a message and see if they respond, I just do cut and paste messages...Even if if they just logged on, or online doesn't mean they will respond so its a crap shoot either way...SB you have to be more careful...I check when they last logged on, if its 2 weeks or more, I avoid messaging them to not waste credits because if u not careful you sending out dozens of messages which can get costly....I spend way too much on that site without realizing it, lolz
 
SDM you can not see when they last logged on, you can only see a tiny green circle that means online now, but doesn't matter anyways, you can message unlimited there so just send a message and see if they respond, I just do cut and paste messages...Even if if they just logged on, or online doesn't mean they will respond so its a crap shoot either way...SB you have to be more careful...I check when they last logged on, if it’s 2 weeks or more, I avoid messaging them to not waste credits because if u not careful you sending out dozens of messages which can get costly....I spend way too much on that site without realizing it, lolz
SA shows online status and also shows last time active in number of minutes/hours. Looks like it doesn’t go to inactive until they aren’t active for over an hour. You can even tell when someone is on when they hide their status, because it sorts in order of last activity (if you want) so you see green circles for some, followed by nothing for others in the list (hidden status) followed by some with green circles so you know the hidden ones are on.

I spend way too much time thinking about their algorithm, as you may have noticed :)
 
Thinking of algorithms. I always wonder about bots and scammers.

I usually will open with something more than just How Are You? but a large
percentage will never respond. I will even take the time to read something
in the profile and use that as part of the opener.

I found that if the account is real it seems the response is higher if the
opener is at least half decent.

When I first got divorced I had a great conversation about openers with what I later
figured out was a Russian pro girl from Philly on Tinder - looking back I kind of wish I
had hooked up with as she was funny but lost her account details.
 
SA shows online status and also shows last time active in number of minutes/hours. Looks like it doesn’t go to inactive until they aren’t active for over an hour. You can even tell when someone is on when they hide their status, because it sorts in order of last activity (if you want) so you see green circles for some, followed by nothing for others in the list (hidden status) followed by some with green circles so you know the hidden ones are on.

I spend way too much time thinking about their algorithm, as you may have noticed :)
The last online when private thing has always been a thing on SA, but yeah it’s easy to miss if you’re just searching specific people instead of scrolling the feed. However, with SB and SA is take the online thing with a grain of salt. A few people that sent me a message/responded to a message I sent a while ago still showed as offline 3+ days. Not entirely sure how that works but I triple checked and there’s some way around that. I didn’t dig enough to figure it out. SB’s messaging system is also ass - if someone responds it doesn’t jump to the top of your list - you need to find the conversation with them to see their response
 
Top