My New Girlfriend

N

nina

#21
#21
reply

Dear All,

1. I said "could" be defamatory, not "IS"
2. "Junkies" as in any kind of addict when it becomes an obsession.
3. I do not read forums in general unless someone emails me and tells me so, like the client who did so for this forum.
4. We work hard to maintain our credibilty and integrity, and I believe the statement I made earlier says all that needs to be said. Thank You.

Best regards,
Nina
 
H

Hotpuppy

Mr.Butterworth
#23
#23
There is a little known , nor much discussed principle in retail. This being that people with a lot of money to spend will not feel they are getting the "best" or even something good if they dont pay alot and in some cases an exorbitant amount for it. What is something worth? Whatever someone is wiling to pay for it.
As for Nina, if you dont like the tone of this thread, go away and stop responding to all us "parlour junkies", and (fill in your own automobile preference guys) drivers.
take care HP

[Edited by Hotpuppy on 07-29-2001 at 07:01 AM]
 
B

Bill Furniture

Flounder
#24
#24
Spellcheck!

Originally posted by nina
Dear Members of this Forum,

I am Nina, the promotions manager of Boutique-Escorts.com
(formerly Worldwide-Escort.com)



At the age of 22, (some years ago), I was in a sales job, and in my first week I earnt
$5000.


Wouldn't that be "I EARNED $5000?"
Click to expand...
 
N

nina

#25
#25
I never said quote "you are all parlour junkies" or implied that you were (take note) "" ALL"" "parlour junkies". Funny how you thought I was talking to you specifically though...:)
-----------------------------------------------------
The irregular form is generally more common in British English and the regular form is more common to American English: earnt, earned;
-----------------------------------------------------
You are too funny!

All the best - I am off - we are quite busy today. Enjoy yourselves!!

Best regards,
Nina

[Edited by nina on 07-29-2001 at 09:17 AM]
 
L

Luciano

#26
#26
Dear Nina,

We'll say whatever we want and there is nothing you can do about it. We have a thing in this country called free speech; don't make us start dumping tea.

If you haven't noticed you run a website that sells women's time for money. This is a web site about the hobby the results from your sales. If we are so lowly as to not be worth your attention, why are you here?

If you would like to tell us why a woman is worth 50k a day then we will all be respectful and attentive.

Your opinions are worth just as much as ours, but this is our forum. As we parlor junkies say, "You in MY hood now".

We all have a common interest, right?
 
W

Wwanderer

Kids, don't try this at home
#28
#28
Different prices for the same product.

Originally posted by Hotpuppy
There is a little known , nor much discussed principle in retail. This being that people with a lot of money to spend will not feel they are getting the "best" or even something good if they dont pay alot and in some cases an exorbitant amount for it.
Click to expand...
Indeed, there are numerous companies that sell *exactly* the
same product at two or more prices under two or more names
and using two or more styles of packaging. The product
names and packaging and, most importantly, the price are
intended to make the precise same product appeal to buyers
at the upscale and downscale ends of the market and various
points between. This can definitely increase market share
for a single product.

Of course, there are also real changes in product quality
with price in most markets. So, it is not always best to
but cheapest or most expensive or... It all depends on the
details.

I am personally aware of three ladies (none of whom advertise
on Botique-escorts.com) who maintain more than one provider
identity with different pricing and different websites etc.
So, it is a known marketing strategy in the Biz too.

-Ww
 
F

fishfry

#29
#29
I've often been with forty dollar street prostitutes who carried pagers. If some guy calls the upscale escort service they page the girl and pay $400. Same girl, same service, same mouth and pussy that have been busy on the street.

The first time this happened I was surprised. But after a while I realized that EVERY street girl, except the ones too strung out to afford a pager, is registered with one or more expensive escort services.

[Edited by fishfry on 07-29-2001 at 12:36 PM]
 
H

Hotpuppy

Mr.Butterworth
#30
#30
Originally posted by nina
I never said quote "you are all parlour junkies" or implied that you were (take note) "" ALL"" "parlour junkies". Funny how you thought I was talking to you specifically though...:)
-----------------------------------------------------
[Edited by nina on 07-29-2001 at 09:17 AM]
Click to expand...
Nina:.
you need to be way more specific and careful any time you throw epithets around- you were careless. Further more you would gain a whole lot more respect on this board if you simply admitted it. But no, you need to fan the flames with the above statement. If you were referring to me, for the record, I have never been in a parlour of the kind of establishment I believe you are referring to.
take care HP
 
T

thelastone

#31
#31
response to nina...

a few things to clarify.

first its to the previous posters:
I've read nina's post several times and I don't see her actually mentioning people of this forum as "parlour junkies". It seems to me that she was trying to make a point that the women in her service don't handle the volume of other brothels. I think the problem occurs because she starts the post in a very defensive position and any remarks are usually seen as a "counter attack" from then on. Sometimes you gotta let some things go.

next this is for nina: This is a review site. What was posted here are our opinions of this business and the people in it. If someone says that $200 is a great price for one lady, and for another, they say it isn't worth it, thats what is called a "review". Now granted it appears that none of the posters on this thread have availed themselves of your service, but none the less, they have posted their thoughts on the subject. None of this is could in no way be considered "deflamatory". If you read the posts, most basically stated that $50,000 was way more than they were willing to pay. That is their choice, and more then welcome to espouse it. Some other posts pondered who would actually use your services. As for your clients that "alerted you to this thread", you might not want to believe everything someone tells you. Most of the beginning of this thread was made in a joking manner. We were having fun. Your defensive nature was certainly not necessary and very ... off putting (is that a word??).
This certainly does not mean that your services are not worth it. In fact HotPuppy states that some items are worth "Whatever someone is willing to pay for it." You obviously are maintaining a business so, people out there believe it is "worth it". If you are looking for a better response, then perhaps you could encourage one of your clients to post a review here. After all, that is the actual purpose here, and quite a lot of information is passed around here. Heck, I'll bet you'll get a few new clients just because of this thread. It certainly doesn't hurt to play nice.

another 2 pesos.

last
 
T

TuckernotSucker

#32
#32
Nina et al

What ever happened to the popular analogy of, OH you charge 50K for your services? Would you do it for 100? What kind of a girl do you thhink I am? Well, we have already established that now we are just negotiating price.
 
H

Hotpuppy

Mr.Butterworth
#33
#33
Re: response to nina...

Originally posted by thelastone


I've read nina's post several times and I don't see her actually mentioning people of this forum as "parlour junkies".
Click to expand...
I dont think its ever necessary to actually call someone( "HP you are a parlour junkie) or a group of people("UG guys, you are all parlour junkies) a particular thing to make the inference stick. This is what I believe Nina was guilty of. I dont know why I care, or why I dont give it up- but there is just something about this woman and her 50K escorts that bothers me.
HP
 
J

justme

homo economicus
#34
#34
I think 'parlour junkies' is one of the funniest epithets I've read in a while. I think I may start using it.

The only people (I think) that could reasonably dole out 50 large for a date with anyone, regardless of their pedigree, must be someone for whom $50,000 means very little. So who cares? Let Nina continue to do her part to insuring both the continuity of trickle down economics and the ongoing proof that a rich fool and his loads of money...
 
C

Casper

#35
#35
If someone has that kind of disposable income, I would think that he would also be smart enough to know that he could get a significantly decent GFE at considerably less cost. Hell think of the fun one can have at Julie's for that kind of cash .... GFE's galore ..............

Just my .02 cents
Peace Out
C
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top