More nonsense from Roger

#1
I'm am glad this location has finally has a review so I didn’t need to create a thread and freely share one of my pending reviews. Not all providers like reviews or share their distaste for reviews immediately so I have been more careful in reviewing overall. I short hand call this location, 15 Belles because of the talent. One of the hidden gems of the most attractive Latin/Spanish and Italian women that I have found in Suffolk.

I have been to this location three times, twice to see a brunette (Floral) (who moved out of the country) and once to see the blonde and have patiently waited to see if other talent has been advertised on well known sites to go again. I felt the blonde while attractive was more focused on tips than the experience or chemistry offered. The description is accurate 5’4, toned, DDs and plum ass. She works out so I felt she tried too much to fit into the Jersey scene and wasn’t really as attractive to me as Floral.

She wore a coat initially at the door but it only covered a tight fitting black dress which was removed shortly afterwards the polite hugs and introductions were made. She wanted me to see she was proud of the bolt-ons and to give a level of mutual understanding confidence to the appointment that was about to start. She walked around the session in a yellow g-string thong that had no visible signs of hair stubble.

This location has been around for eight or nine months now with limited week and daily availability staffed usually with a single attendant. This is in contrast to when they first opened and had two attendants. They previously had a Commack spot during COVID but it shouldn’t be confused with a different crew (other Latin crews in that area that started to ask for 180hh). This spot has been always 160hh plus tips. When they first opened, it was staffed by two attendants, one handling the phone and one handling their work and now just one person.

The number advertised is usually for the attendant only so she limited in her time between appointments. Hh is 160 plus the extras. Limited conversation via text but calls were more helpful with clearing the confusion of location or session concerns. The ad does show an active presence of the girl that is not airbrushed or modified. The angle of the photo is adjusted for possible exposure but it’s accurate if you’re able to recognize the photo that is not the proximal one.
My first time there, there was no direct extras offered but there were signs that more could have been had. The second visit with Floral was passionate and very pleasant in every yoga position (CFS). That mat moved a few times and made us both laugh as we tried to stay on it. Best experience I had with a provider and worth the price. It was too bad she moved out of the country and I lost touch with her.

My recent experience with the blonde, she was more interested in offering extras than just the pre-fixed menu of a hand release. She often said, more tips love as I tried to roam anywhere. She kept my hand on her plum ass as I tried to go anywhere. On the flip, she offered CFS for an additional $200. I felt like the experience was spirit airlines than an inclusive experience. I knew from the lubricant bottle on the table and the couch in the room that more was available from the prior visits of the massage table and yoga mats days once they first opened. That was later confirmed by the offer again once I had five minutes remaining and no relevant release. At two minutes remaining, I ended the appointment because her nails were getting too uncomfortable to enjoy myself.

I imagine that no extras are often not on the first day as a safety measure for the talent and the experience. Be safe.
So you didn't want to review for what reason?
 
#4
Are you talking about the three or four "reviews" that wound up in the Coliseum?
My decision to post in a manner I am comfortable with is as a result of those and others like my experience with the talent at 516-434-0458 who point blanked asked my new burner account while making an appointment a few months ago: “Do you have a review of the girls from Long Island? Do you want to do a review in Utopia? I don't need that, please. It's dangerous for the girls. Then there are thieves, police officers and people with fake money, even rapists. They don't want reviews.”

The only prior text I made to this person was, “Are you open and what’s your availability like for an appointment today?” I reached out to the provider the same day as I read a separate review and that review not written by me probably gave the provider an influx of unsolicited attention. I realized this attention might cause a ripple effect.

I took that as a utopian effect and reduced my expectations, effort and enthusiasm for the hobby by thinking attention could be good, bad or indifferent and some talent might not like the accountability or the attention.

Additionally, I got busy with my own life and also still operate under an increased microscope due to slight changes to how I might organize my reviews, thoughts or reviews that I post. I want my reviews to reflect the quality of service that I received and not discouraged or criticized solely because the author.
 
#5
It's very simple to throw off the scent of who you are, you could literally be writing it 5 minutes after the session and just put went here 2 days ago or last week. Also, the in detail about the numerous phone calls and parking in one lot so she can see you and other "little details" that lead up to the session as well as ones that happen after the session is what enables providers to figure things out and put faces to screen names.
 

billyS

Reign of Terror
#6
My decision to post in a manner I am comfortable with is as a result of those and others like my experience with the talent at 516-434-0458
That number doesn't come up anywhere on UG except this thread. So it's a place you visited and didn't review because they asked you not to?

A Google search comes up with a petite white blond who advertises pegging but no FS.
Did you see her and not review her?

.......and also still operate under an increased microscope due to slight changes to how I might organize my reviews, thoughts or reviews that I post. I want my reviews to reflect the quality of service that I received and not discouraged or criticized solely because the author.
You're "under the microscope" because you are in moderation for past missteps which include writing bad or misleading reviews on women you didn't get along with as revenge (see your threads in the Coliseum).

You are not under "increased" scrutiny because of the review you wrote with a new format.

It was already explained to you that it raised eyebrows among the staff because of who you copied the format from.
But it's over now let it go.
 
#7
That number doesn't come up anywhere on UG except this thread. So it's a place you visited and didn't review because they asked you not to?

A Google search comes up with a petite white blond who advertises pegging but no FS.
Did you see her and not review her?



You're "under the microscope" because you are in moderation for past missteps which include writing bad or misleading reviews on women you didn't get along with as revenge (see your threads in the Coliseum).

You are not under "increased" scrutiny because of the review you wrote with a new format.

It was already explained to you that it raised eyebrows among the staff because of who you copied the format from.
But it's over now let it go.
I wrote bad reviews on women/providers based my experience and not as revenge. I do not appreciate that accusation. I do not appreciate the accusation. Again, this is not germane to the prior review in this thread.
 
#8
That number doesn't come up anywhere on UG except this thread. So it's a place you visited and didn't review because they asked you not to?

A Google search comes up with a petite white blond who advertises pegging but no FS.
Did you see her and not review her?

You're "under the microscope" because you are in moderation for past missteps which include writing bad or misleading reviews on women you didn't get along with as revenge (see your threads in the Coliseum).

You are not under "increased" scrutiny because of the review you wrote with a new format.

It was already explained to you that it raised eyebrows among the staff because of who you copied the format from.
But it's over now let it go.
I previously reviewed a different provider (post # 8) from the same location. 631-487-5036- holtsville. New number for location.

It is not non-sense. I tried a different approach/style to my one of my reviews and there were consideration or implications of the template that I was not knowledgeable of.

There is more shade/increased scrutiny and criticism thrown on my reviews or posts because I have been in moderation because some providers didn't like what I said. None of my reviews were review abuse or intended as a form of punishment to any provider. I was truthful to my experience. I am not arguing but sharing a different viewpoint.
 
Top