I have serious doubts about someone having two licenses. Especially when the process by which the second (with a totally bogus address) was obtained does not make any sense. How does sending mail to yourself at someone else's address, as CK said he did to start the process, fit into the process? What does that establish that one could rely on to get one's address changed on one's license or, more importantly, as CK claims, to set some sort of basis to get a second license. I have asked CK twice but there has been no respnse. I am really not believing this story. For the last two posters, having one's PO Box as an address is not at all relevant to CK's claim that he has two licenses. When will you speak-up again on this CK? I would very much like for you to say something that makes some sort of sense so that I could believe you. Any other doubters out there (curious seems to be one but I would leave that for him to say for sure)?
Wouldn't you have to very CAREFULLY, not randomly, pick out an address to send things to? It would have to be either a vacant building or a house where you KNOW you can get access to the mail before the occupant does. Either way I expect there is some sort of mail fraud crime going on, quite possibly a federal offense due to it involving the postal service. Then you have the crime of misrepresentation at the DMV-- I KNOW you have to sign things there that state all your info is true. Then ever after you are carrying around evidence of this misrepresentation. Even if what CK says is true, I don't think it's particularly wise to do this, given the chances of getting busted for it all the way down the line. Plus the fact that most people who are falsifying documentation this way are doing it for much more evil reasons than trying to cover up their mongering (tell them the truth when you get busted and see if they believe you) and you're almost sure to get the book thrown at you if you're caught, and get your life disrupted to a very high degree.
It just doesn't seem like any rewards from this could possibly outweigh the obvious risks.
Last edited: