For the most part, I do not mind the cameras ( except the red light ones and the revenue raisers .. ie. speed cameras)
If a crime is being committed or LE needs to keep someone under surveillance- more power to them. I refer to a violent felon or something along those serious lines..
Maybe I’ll take some flack here, but if serious crimes can be prevented by the eye on the sky — that’s good..
also must have to assume the justice system works as it’s supposed to ( warrants etc)
If a crime is being committed or LE needs to keep someone under surveillance- more power to them. I refer to a violent felon or something along those serious lines..
Maybe I’ll take some flack here, but if serious crimes can be prevented by the eye on the sky — that’s good..
also must have to assume the justice system works as it’s supposed to ( warrants etc)
They can only be better prosecuted.
It's a strange thing that people think laws, or "safety measures" make them "safer". It's not true.
But yeah, if someone kills you and tries to make you disappear like Judge Crater or Jimmy Hoffa, the odds of that happening are less likely. You'll still be dead. But they have a better shot at knowing who did it.
I'll opt for fewer cameras, thank you. They are never used "properly". Ever.