3somes -- are they as good as they seem?

H

HornDogBuddah

#1
#1
One of my fantasies is to do a threesome with two ladies at once. When I think of all the positions, interactions, body parts to fondle, lick, etc., etc., as well as the manly man role that I would play in repeatedly bringing both ladies to multiple screaming O's (I get to star in my own fantasy, don't I?), well, it doesn't get much better than that.

But does the reality measure up to the fantasy? (I know, I know, you're going to say that reality NEVER lives up to the fantasy.) So how about it? Those of you who have experience here, what insights can you shares? And ladies, please jump in. What do you think of group sex? What makes a 3some be a smash hit, and what makes it a dud. (Is it possible? Oh, that's right, maybe I didn't live up to my part of the fantasy.)
 
P

Phantom

#3
#3
Charley and this beautiful, young, busty, blonde stripper she and I talked into coming back to my hotel room. The stripper was THE most gorgeous girl I've EVER been with. Charley is nothing to sneeze at either.
 
O

Ozzy

#6
#6
phantom.......shuldn't you be getting a world class bj right about now.


btw........i bet charley had as much if not more fun than you had with that stripper. also was she really the hottest? you've been thru some super fine poon.
 
P

Phantom

#7
#7
Another 18 hours. Without a doubt Charley enjoyed that stripper just as much as I did. I'll send you a picture of the stripper. YOU tell me if shes hot.
 
S

San_Te

#8
#8
I have found it doesn't live up to the fantasy but you should try it at least once. The frequent change of covers and other safety issues detract from the experience.
 
V

ValerieXXX

#11
#11
Guys it IS fun, now the thing you gotta remember is to match up the ladies perfectly. I have been with, Jessica Lee, Brenda (obviously) Hannah and Kelly from my alliance. We all are friends, it just makes it that much more exciting. We also have the best hygiene, which might I add is KEY!!!!! I am very picky and the mother in the meadow talk is important! I don't want to go down on something that will gag a maget!!
Light airy converstaion, in short one hours are cool, but hey don't rush!!! You got three people that have to be in sync just let the juices flow (yes pun intended) Sometimes we do run over so not to worry if there are some who are concerned with the conversation part. Idea here is to enjoy everything because it is a little more of a donation. And if done right, the fantasy will be more than fulfilled!!! Yummy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
G

guy catelli

#12
#12
my 3 cents ...

i have to say that i share the APM's concerns on this one. my only 3-somes have been with civilian women so far.

IQ test.
(choose only one of the answers below.)

who would a young, beautiful, bi woman probably prefer to make love with:

a. another young, beautiful, bi woman; or

b. guy catelli?



[Edited by guy catelli on 02-04-2001 at 03:51 PM]
 
G

guy catelli

#14
#14
2's company; 3's a crowd

i've inquired about, or been offered, a 3-some on a number of occasions. the ones who offer are offering to do it with a friend they're already compatible with. as performance art goes, i'm left wondering "what's my motivation?"

i look at it like this: a woman who endures being in the same room with me for over an hour is entitled to double or triple her ususal fee. but, if she's there doing what she would already be happy to do for free {unlike sharing her time and companionship with me ;)}, then why am i paying two fees just to watch a performance with no 'dramatic predicament'?

sure, i could 'get in the way' if i wanted to, but i would feel like a jerk if i did.

i remember one escort at an incall establishment whom i had asked if she would do a 3-some. she said she was straight, but that there was another escort there she didn't mind doing it with because they were friends.

i said i had someone else in mind. she said she would consider it, but that i should know that with anyone else it would just be 'an act'. i chuckled and said, "it's all an act!" she was too polite to say so, but she had a look on her face like she acknowledged that was true regarding me, but not her friend ;).

anyway, because i'm an evil pervert, i would want two women who didn't know each other -- and at least one of whom had little or no prior experience with any woman.

in this scenario, i would be watching a real 'drama', that is, the less-experienced one's learning more about herself. for me personally, that would be something worth paying just to watch.

but, as others have already said, the chemistry between the two women would have to be just right. so, this would require my being a good casting director, along with everything else.

so far, i've never pushed it, because all the elements haven't yet been there.

[Edited by guy catelli on 02-04-2001 at 08:46 PM]
 
H

HornDogBuddah

#15
#15
GC: you bring up two very interesting points.

1. By scripting for two women who "didn't know each other -- and at least one of whom had little or no prior experience with any woman," you address the issue that others had raised -- by allowing your bed to be occupied by two women who already have an attraction to (and prior experience with) each other, they might have little need for, nor interest in, your being there at all.

2. "in this scenario, i would be watching a real 'drama', that is, the less-experienced one's learning more about herself. for me personally, that would be something worth paying just to watch." I agree. But if you are paying to watch, does that mean you are relegated to the status of "watcher not participant?" (Not necessarily something that is unappealing, as long as your status is known and agreed up front.)

My original post had to do more with what other guys have found to be their experience when they are the center of attention -- i.e., I am paying two women to have them do me. This is entirely different from three people finding themselves in bed together (2GFE?) where any dyad is equally OK as any other.
 
G

guy catelli

#17
#17
i concur

Originally posted by Judge Crater
Used to get invited for three-somes by lesbian bi-couple roommates when I was in my twenties. Since these women were serious about each other, it was worth the physical confusion that sometimes occurs in such situations. Have tried three-somes professionally. Really not worth it. Hard enough getting over the fakery that most providers bring to a session. When there is two of them, the fakery just gets multiplied. You could actually step out of the room, come back and still see the film running. Might as well not be there for all the reality that you would get out of it.
Click to expand...
definitely a major risk -- and, another reason to get two women that don't know each. even though you risk getting the 'chemistry' wrong, at least if you get it right, you've got something real going down.

[Edited by guy catelli on 02-05-2001 at 04:24 PM]
 
G

guy catelli

#18
#18
my ultimate film fantasy 3-some was depicted in Bad Lieutenant.

Harvey Keitel plays the typical pre-Giuliani nypd narcotics detective. http://www.coastnet.com/~lwr/Fcourt/BadLieu.htm

at one point http://www.blarg.net/~dr_z/Movie/Posters/bad_ltn.html we see him in bed in a hotsheet hotel with two young women, all of them on cloud nine -- presumably a matter of 'professional courtesy' all around -- with Johnny Ace's haunting ballad Pledging My Love (a premonition of Ace's own imminent death) playing in the backround. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/A...1424685/sr=2-1/ref=sc_m_1/107-5697834-3011704



[Edited by guy catelli on 02-05-2001 at 09:09 PM]
 
O

Ozzy

#19
#19
actually theres a scene in an UNRATED version of bad Lieutenant where he's in a car with two girls, giving them orders on how to do each other.......

you can't rent that ver at blockbuster so look hard for it cause it's a whole different movie than the R rated one.
 
P

Phantom

#20
#20
If I emember correctly there is an early 80's movie called, "I, the jury". In which there is a scene with a pair of stacked, gorgeous set of identical twins.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top