Creampie Redhead Rachel 516-823-5186 North Massapequa/Farmingdale current #516-828-3381
- Thread starter iwantagoodhj247
- Start date
original posters review is excellent and on point... she is definitely an SA girl which makes this thread weird as she doesn’t have ads anywhere. Redhead, freckles, massive tits and normal LI girl personality. Def has the hot chick next door you wait for this type of weather to how much of her slamming body you can see.
Rachel is very much worth the price of admission. Her blowjob is fantastic, porn star quality.
looks: 8
personality: 8
service:10
Rachel is very much worth the price of admission. Her blowjob is fantastic, porn star quality.
looks: 8
personality: 8
service:10
I don't agree.
I reread the entire thread to see if it needed to be closed
Nothing fishy going on.
The OP is @iwantagoodhj247 one of the most honest members here, his reviews speak for themselves.
They were also confirmed by @gold69, another prolific and well trusted member.
The only problem posts were from a member since banned who has a history of fighting with providers.
Nothing fishy going on here.
I reread the entire thread to see if it needed to be closed
Nothing fishy going on.
The OP is @iwantagoodhj247 one of the most honest members here, his reviews speak for themselves.
They were also confirmed by @gold69, another prolific and well trusted member.
The only problem posts were from a member since banned who has a history of fighting with providers.
Nothing fishy going on here.
Just to be clear I did take a closer look at the accusations leveled by @Niceone.
He claimed she admitted to him that if you write a good review you get a better rate.
After he showed me the entire chain of texts between them it was obvious he was demanding a better price based on what he read here and he was the one who accused her of giving a better price for a better review.
Her response to that was an obvious sarcastic one.
If read all of niceones posts in other threads you will see he has a limited command of the English language which I believe led to this misunderstanding.
He claimed she admitted to him that if you write a good review you get a better rate.
After he showed me the entire chain of texts between them it was obvious he was demanding a better price based on what he read here and he was the one who accused her of giving a better price for a better review.
Her response to that was an obvious sarcastic one.
If read all of niceones posts in other threads you will see he has a limited command of the English language which I believe led to this misunderstanding.