Wifef vs Provider - Round 1
- Thread starter Slinky Bender
- Start date
I think the providers are better because there is more variety. How many wives out there will do BBBJ, bodyslides, ass tickles, facials, russian, etc. I think slim & none. I would be satisfied if I could just get the BBJ part. Covered sex no matter how thin the raincoat sucks. If I could come home to thongs, bbbj, nice massage, or bodyslide, I would probably never have to hobby again. I say that now but now matter what the body gets it would never be enough. Drilling the same hole over & over would get boring.
I personally think sex with my wife is better. What I miss and what the PROV provide is variety and I don't mean different positions. My wife is reasonably accomodating...Greek is just about all she won't do and she never refuses me. But I love women..and the hobby allows me to sample (black, white, asian, tall, short, skinny, fat). And while my wife has been both skinny and a little chubby at one point or another in our marriage...she has never been able to quite get taller etc...
Commercial vs. Noncommerical Sex
I guess I'm lucky. I'm separated, but still have sex with my wife every 4-6 weeks. Most times, it's better than with a provider. Plus, she does everything I could possibly want and looks better than most providers out there (former model).
And that goes for my other noncommercial relationships too. Basically, even most gfe providers are not as good as "the real deal." If you're with someone who is out to please you (and you them) just for the fun of it, love or whatever, unless she's totally inept, it's always going to be better than someone acting for solely (or mainly) economic reasons.
For me, I see providers only when I'm in between girlfriends and/or the girl I'm with is not readily available. However, I've been with providers who have been extremely good, but I think that usually comes from getting to know each other and there has to be some chemistry. I cannot think of a provider that I've been with where everything was totally satisfying and there was no chemistry. In short, my guess is that if the provider would not go near you if you had met in a different context, then it's never going to be as good as sex with someone who would, no matter how gfe she acts.
My 2 cents.
I guess I'm lucky. I'm separated, but still have sex with my wife every 4-6 weeks. Most times, it's better than with a provider. Plus, she does everything I could possibly want and looks better than most providers out there (former model).
And that goes for my other noncommercial relationships too. Basically, even most gfe providers are not as good as "the real deal." If you're with someone who is out to please you (and you them) just for the fun of it, love or whatever, unless she's totally inept, it's always going to be better than someone acting for solely (or mainly) economic reasons.
For me, I see providers only when I'm in between girlfriends and/or the girl I'm with is not readily available. However, I've been with providers who have been extremely good, but I think that usually comes from getting to know each other and there has to be some chemistry. I cannot think of a provider that I've been with where everything was totally satisfying and there was no chemistry. In short, my guess is that if the provider would not go near you if you had met in a different context, then it's never going to be as good as sex with someone who would, no matter how gfe she acts.
My 2 cents.