I'm moving this from a great review by @vad1 as to not fuck up his thread.
So let me explain @frogger54
To post a link to an ad on an initial review is permissable because it gives readers a full picture of the provider.
To post the providers full ad three weeks in, when her ad and picture have already been posted is shilling, especially when she had already expressed a desire to do it the right way.
What I did earlier in the week by posting said providers info was allowed since
A) she paid for an ad
B) I was the one who worked with her and the board, by her request to get her ad up.
Notice my posts were allowed to stand despite much back channel bitching. Doesn't that tell you something?
Let it go @frogger54 , your plan didn't work. Move on.
So let me explain @frogger54
To post a link to an ad on an initial review is permissable because it gives readers a full picture of the provider.
To post the providers full ad three weeks in, when her ad and picture have already been posted is shilling, especially when she had already expressed a desire to do it the right way.
What I did earlier in the week by posting said providers info was allowed since
A) she paid for an ad
B) I was the one who worked with her and the board, by her request to get her ad up.
Notice my posts were allowed to stand despite much back channel bitching. Doesn't that tell you something?
Let it go @frogger54 , your plan didn't work. Move on.