Originally posted by jseah
you need to look at it from the provider's point of view. what about the client who calls and books an appointment, and then no shows? I think point she is trying to make is that for every hooker that no shows, doesn't call, etc.....there is a john that will make an appointment with a hooker and doesn't confirm or no shows..........
[scratching head in befuddlement]
Jseah, I don't think you thought that through.
Everyone has a POV, and what about the client that no shows? The providers of the world have a right, that they excercise more and more, to have boards such as these where they share information [reviews if you will] of clients. Those who "perform" up to their expectations and those who don't.
Neither should limit the others' right to commentary.
Originally posted by jseah
f we expect them to act professionally, then we need to reciprocate and act professionally as well
And who says the the majority of us don't? Have you taken some kind of poll I am unaware of?
Like I said, providers and clients alike, commentary on boards such as these is fair when presented within the boundaries of excepted norms. In our case, fair review and no outting, etc.
Those who go outside the norms are dealt with in the same way any sociatal microcosm works. They are dealt out of the hand, ostracized, made to feel small for their actions, etc.
Kimmie is wrong headed about this. You can't say, "Don't bash ho's who show up late or not at all because clients do the same thing." You do say that negative impact on providers who are commented on in such ways is counter-balanced by similar commentary that can [and is] made about johns who do the same thing. Thus, if you want better providers be prepared to be better johns, because it works both ways.