JAG is host of new Julie's web site - JAG is not Consumer Reports anymore!

Status
Not open for further replies.
By MadMach on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 09:26 am:

JAG Mgmt welcomes free-spirited discussion, but we do not look kindly on the intentional harming of another human being.

Most of you know that Candi Day is no longer in the business. She's gone on to a respectable job and JAG Mgmt is happy for her.

Candi learned that her picture had been posted soon after the fact. (A JAG member called her or *****ed her about it.) She then wrote us and asked that the picture be taken down immediately as it threatened her new life.

We agreed to do this as it seemed the right thing to do.

Opinions obviously differ about why Viagra Vic chose to post her picture. VV and Candi have a long history of conflict on this and other boards. We are in no position to judge how real their apparent bad feelings about each other may be. Maybe Viagra Vic wanted to make a joke. Maybe he we wanted to scare her. Maybe he wanted someone who knows her in her new life to see the picture he posted. We don't know what he intended. But it seems to us more likely than not that he meant inflict pain on her.

When it was suggested that we invite VV to start posting on JAG we agreed because we were assured VV would be on his best behavior. Our view is that his decision to post Candi's picture was grossly irresponsible. It is NEVER appropriate to make posts that threaten people in their real lives. We won't permit that.

One final note: Candi is NOT LeBeguine.

MadMach




Hombre.... jag is lying to you (like they always do). i'll foward you my password if you would like and try it yourself. maybe MM should check in with his other moderator to see who pulled my plug... i know for a fact candide is staff, i've know for a while she had controls (i've seen her edit her posts on the non member board) i accused her before, and this one proves it. they'll take down candide's picture but not those posts which janelle (and some other jag members) actually believed put her in harms way. thats total bull shit and you know it. i put up april's, shauna,s taylors and buffys picture along with candide's... does that mean i'm threatening their lives too. i don't like being painted as a stalker or someone who's out to get candi. she a pathetic paranoid and those are her words coming from MM..... hmmmm maybe she's MM? my password is off and candide did it... because she an irrational psychotic bitch. didn't you read the crap she posted her in her last appearance?


funny... but tank did worse than what MM accused me of by posting real names... that was left up for over a week and tank didn't get the boot.

and if i my access wasn't cut than how come i complained about it (i sent ******s to jag and aristotle) days before the picture came down.


and no ones ever been banned from jag.. yeah.... i'm lying, P's lying, slinky's lying, H4Cs is lying.... funny but people who claimed to have their IP's banned (mine wasn't... just my access) from jag also couldn't log into julie for a while (until their IP's changed).
 
Last edited:
BTW....


whats the title of the thread i posted my pictures in.....?



"post provider pictures here"


that thread (two of them it's so large) is full of past and current providers.


and i posted April's picture (the same one on her samantha website) before that site even went public so technically she wasn't an active provider (yet) either. i posted it exactly like candide's (with NO NAME) and both just said "guess who"... .... but i'm sure there's a spin about how THATS different than candide.....huh?


and just so everyone knows... that's a picture of candide that SHE used to ****** to anyone.... no different than what mandie does now for example..... and those same pics of mandie (lots of them) are posted on jag in the same threads as candi's.....

you know...

i read the rules at jag... and i don't seem to remember seeing anything that says that candide gets any different treatment than anyone else. maybe they should add that one
 
Last edited:
Oh!... one more thing since i don't have to behave myself anymore (which seemed to be a condition of my returning to jag)... but the original topic of this thread started by rufus moses was about jag and julies both sharing servers... well that was denied by jag management and some still thought it could have been a coincidence... well jag moved to a new server and IP a few weeks ago (to a location on the west coast i believe).... yet jag and julie (who also moved her site a few weeks ago (remember they were off line the same weekend) still share the same server. any of you techie guys need not take my word on this..... check for yourselves.


(RM.... consider this latest episode of "exposing jag" my early xmas present to you)
 
Last edited:
one last thing..... (for tonight)


if *I* wanted to hurt candide by posting her picture on the internet (it's a fully clothed photo btw)...... why wouldn't i do it here (on UG)? where it would be left up forever? and would certainly be reach more public eyes?

guess that spin looks pretty bad now doesn't it.



and LeB is candide. anyone who doesn't see that just does look.
 
Oooops...

Ozz-o, a clarification posted later last nite makes it look like you are indeed banned; I did not doubt your word on this. An earlier post was worded in a way that did not directly address the issue, but appeared to imply that you were not actually banned.

The membership appears to be solidly behind a universally applied set of standards, and is less willing to tolerate shit like this happening behind closed doors. I think that more incidents like this could easily lead to a crippling mass exodus; this time the "troublemakers" include most of JAG's remaining prominent members.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Regardless of your intent re the Candi pic, it wasn't the best judgement to post the thing given the history between you two and the fact of her retirement. You can see that, right? You're smart enough to know (or at least entertain the possibility) that A) she'd find out about it and B) she'd be upset about it. So can you at least understand why your motives might be questioned?

The word on its removal -- which I have good reason to believe -- is that Candi requested it. Retired providers should have the opportunity to stay retired and not have their past dragged forcibly out into the spotlight against their wishes, don't you think?
 
Last edited:
Excuse me, but last time I checked JAG was a privately owned club. They can restrict, ban, admit according to whatever standards they like.

This whole thread reminds me of what happens when simple functions turn into.. what's the word.... CULTS ....... yeah, that's it.

A whoreboard becomes a sports team or a closed community or pick your own metaphor. Soon, it's us vs them. It's Augusta keeping women out. It's a violation of civil rights. There's a hidden agenda somehwere!!!! Steel cage deathmatch!

This is why I gave up on newsgroups. Some people just need to be offended or restricted, so they can complain about it.

It (and this) is a place to get information, insights and feel perhaps a bit of a connection, but don't go overboard on that last point. End of minor rant....
 
Last edited:
hombre....


of course i knew it might stir something... but this? if i had posted KS's picture would this have happened. i didn't put her name and several knew who it was. since when is it that bad to share photo's of any internet legend. would tasha ray's pics be taken down? isn't this also the same candide who supposedly infultrated jag (posed as a client) and attacked *ME*(a fellow client) on that board... because i asked to have what some felt was damaging info about janelle removed.
 
from the jag non-member board.....

for Littleguy and JohnnyK

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JAG Discussion Board: General Discussion: A note for Littleguy and JohnnyK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Candide on Wednesday, September 04, 2002 - 07:52 pm:

Hey, guess what guys? I stole photos of you two - one of each of you - and I'm going to post them on the internet with a big caption saying: "Littleguy and Johnnyk are two male whores for sale!" Then, what I figure I'll do next is, I'll go on some whore board sites and start flapping my big mouth and saying stuff like..."gosh, I posted photos of Littleguy and Johnny K and now I'm paranoid that people are mad at me cause I had no business having that photo since they never gave it to me so who wants to take the bait and start talking about J.K. and Littleguy, the two male providers who are my favorite whores on the net? WHo wants to join me in making a total sshole of themselves." Does this sound familiar at all guys? And 'whoever dares take down the photo of the faces of those two guys or whoever doesnt like that I did that is a no good rotten sneak, etc. etc.'

Would you guys like it if I did that to you? Yeah? Great then I'll do it. See, I figure you would appreciate it cause the two of you have made your opinions public and I want you to know you have some f***'ing nerve! What did I ever do to you? Just because some moron who took a photo I never gave him and who posted it in a whore site...even though I am not a whore does not mean it was an appropriate thing to do. And if he pulls something like that again I will give him what he wants since he is obviously so bored he needs to go to such outrageous lengths to force me to talk to him. I'll talk to you across my lawyers conference room table you jerk.

Since someone told me that my photo was up in there (you know that had to happen sooner or later, right) I wrote to the webmaster here: [*****]madchaos@jaginfo.net[/*****] - you know the same place other outsiders, with no membership have to write to? And I told him what was posted in his site and even though he was out of town on business one of his staff was nice enough to delete it for me. I asked them if they thought that was fair or correct and they agreed with me that since I am not a hooker my photo doesn't belong in Jag and since I did not, in good faith (or otherwise) ever gave it to the moron psychotic who posted it in there, that it was not his to post. Also, the JAG people figured it was no real loss since I am so ugly and repulsive and untouchable anyway. Since I am so hideous looking they figured they did you all a favor deleting it. So can you two do me a favor..shut the F*** up alright? Do not talk about me on UG or JAG or anywhere. And how Mother F***'ing dare you say it is okay for that creep to post my photo? If you really feel that way then I will post one of you and one of Ozzy too, and that retard Flounder as well, and you can all see for yourselves why it is not a good idea. I think you are all nuts! I am not JAG staff, Ozzy is a troublemaker, and whatever bs he is spewing on UG I don't care. I don't look in there either because that site makes me feel like hurling. I merely wanted to tell all of you to lay off me and leave me the f*** alone already!

By JohnnyK on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 07:42 am:


For the record, I never said it was right (posting the pic) and I'm glad its down. I just thought the punishment was harsh.

By Candide on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 06:20 pm:


Pictures of The Guys

http://www.geocities.com/photosontheweb2002/

By littleguy on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 07:44 pm:


Candide,

I can't say you've never shot your mouth off before without any or all of the facts as I believe if I look hard enough I will find your admission of same. You're hardly stupid. So why do/say stupid things ?

Having said that, what the FUCK are you talking about ?

Someone been lying to you ? Blowing wind up your skirt ? Are you sure you have some (or even ANY) of your "facts" straight ?You've "called" VV/Ozzy before on not having the facts and posting as if what he says IS fact.

You said "I figure you would appreciate it cause the two of you have made your opinions public"

And "Flapping my big mouth" ???

What opinions ? Quote me !!! Let's see it....

FYI, the only thing I said on JAG about you is the following (after your picture was posted)

AND I QUOTE "Hell, if that's Candi Day, I'd have seen her. She looks kinda cute. (And I KNOW she's very bright. Much brighter than I)"

Oh, and I did allude (in another thread) to the animosity between you and VV/Ozzy and suggested he might have posted you picture to "tweak" you.

Other than that, let's see what I said about you that you felt was so hurtful.

Time to ante up girl.

By Candide on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 08:12 pm:


Littleguy, I have no idea nor do I care, nor do I want to know what anyone said or ever says in JAG. I am no longer a member, have not been a member for some time and never want to be a member again. All I know is someone told me a fairly recent photo of my face was up in there and I thought that was pretty low of whoever put it up in there.

I apologize Littleguy. Just the fact that you answered that idiot's meandering drivel on UG made me mad. I knew it was a matter of time before I got pulled in again. I didn't mean to start anything. I am getting very tired of this and of him. I am not brighter than you Littleguy. You are much brighter than I will ever be.

I have not been on UG in a long time - I haven't been here on JAG in a long time...now I am back because that two year old weenie head has my photograph? I am not JAG staff for the last time. I was never JAG staff. How stupid am I for letting him drag me back into this? I feel pretty stupid.

As much as I do not like him I would never post a picture of his face on a whore board or anywhere. A picture he has no business having. I would never do to anyone what he has done to me.

I am angry and upset and I am sorry. I apologize, Littleguy, to you, and to JohnnyK and to JAG. I didn't want to start anything.

I have no interest in JAG and I just want to live in peace. Ozzy, please find a new mud slinging buddy. I refuse to get dragged in or to answer you. What you did was wrong. I am not a whore and you had no business posting my picture without my permission. You are wrong and you are a big baby too. Just leave me alone already!

By Candide on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 08:46 pm:


Ooops and I forgot one

http://www.geocities.com/photosontheweb2002/forgotone.html

By Flounder on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 08:55 pm:


groan!

By mopar-into-the-sunset on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 09:11 pm:


Howdy C.

Don't mind the kiddies, the mantle of imortality weighs heavily on their shoulders (since it was themselves who patted themselves on their collective backs and convinced themselves that they were witty, possibly even educated). It's been a longtime since anything original has been posted by one of the greats.

That's why they were against the classic posts - it embarasses them since they are merely a shadow of themselves.

Live long and prosper.

By MadMach on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 09:37 pm:


JAG Mgmt welcomes free-spirited discussion, but we do not look kindly on the intentional harming of another human being.

JAG apologizes to Candide for causing anger and anxiety by VV/Ozzy.

MadMach

By Candide on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 10:04 pm:


Word Mopar.

Thank you Madmach and no hard feelings.

I am going away now.

C.

By mopar on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 10:24 pm:


(insert The Great Kazoo dissapearance sound)

By MadMach on Friday, September 06, 2002 - 12:08 am:


The battle is over and the peace has returned to JAG. Unlike other places, JAG is a place of peace where members can exchange ideas and infomration in a peaceful manner.

MadMach

By JohnnyK on Friday, September 06, 2002 - 07:09 am:


Ooops and I forgot one

http://www.geocities.com/photosontheweb2002/forgotone.html

Would you like to shoot him now or wait til' we get home?
Oh no you don't, not this time. This time we'll wait til' we get home!

**BLAM!!!**

I was hurt at first that I was left out. At least I have my own page now.

You're dessssppppicabbble.....
.

extremely funny.

btw.. candide, are you insinuating that *I* STOLE YOUR PICTURE? how prey tell? you e*mailed me that picture... me and a hundred other guys. i sent you one ****** to set up a date and you sent me that picture (and two other) and asked if i still wanted to meet you. i've told the story before... right her eon UG in the early days.... (we discussed our date... remember?). anyone who has seen a picture from mandie is no different today. she doesn't have a site, but her pictures have been on almost everyone’s hard drives or in their ******s.


ps... to MM or who ever you are that's not[/n] candide.... you did give tank the boot for what was obviously a flagrant rule violation in posting fellow clients names.... maybe you should heed my advice and add that "no offending candide" to your "rules" page, as well as stipulate who is exempt from them. there were at least two other retired (what ever that means in THIS business) providers who’s pics were posted before i put up candide's picture. i didn't see those guys catching any boot.
 
Last edited:

"JAG Mgmt welcomes free-spirited discussion, but we do not look kindly on the intentional harming of another human being"


so madmach....

accusing rufus of being a pdophile is OK?



or are you saying that Rufus Moses is not a human being?
 
only because this is soo compelling..... (to some anyway)

By LeBeguine on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 09:30 am:


MM:

you are a gentleman and a scholar. im sure your final word will be the final word.

humble jagster,
B.

By LeBeguine on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 09:32 am:


der, oh yeah.

thank you.


not mistress manners (today at least),
B.

By MadMach on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 10:03 am:


JAG Mgmt would be more than happy to have VV back at JAG if he shares information with others and participates in discussion without any intention of harming anyone in real life on purpose.

In addition, Mr. P's access was NEVER turned off by JAG Mgmt. He still has a valid access to JAG and he is always welcomed at JAG.

MadMach

By Pat McGroyne on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 03:38 pm:


MM,

Thank you. That is exactly what I was requesting in my post on the other thread in response to Hombre Secreto's questions/suggestions.

I agree that the situation mentioned above is totally out of line and is something JAG should avoid at all costs.

Thanks again!

Pat!

By littleguy on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 07:04 pm:


So does this mean VV's ID and password has been re-instated (assuming it was revoked in the first place (which seems obvious it was))

BTW MM, glad to see you respond to membership's inquiries.

By mopar on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 08:32 pm:


Membership is a priviledge and never a right for anyone.

By MadMach on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 09:17 pm:


I apologize for not responding promptly. I am away on a business trip.

VV's ID has not been re-instated as of now.

MadMach

By LeBeguine on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 09:27 pm:


mm:

why was he nullified? was it the candi post or was there something else? i know u are busy, please rsvp at your convenience.

$0.02: in my limited experience pests are their own worst enemy, they often nullify themselves. remember junior high?

vv oughta do unto others,
B.

By MadMach on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 09:28 pm:


I would welcome VV with open arms if he come in peace. However, I don't welcome Ozzy when he comes to JAG with an agenda.

I love peace, not war.

MadMach

By littleguy on Friday, September 06, 2002 - 09:48 am:


Sorry MM, I'm still a little confused (it's not all that difficult)

I don't believe it has been established with any certainty whethert VV posted that pic as anything other than a curiosity item. Many of us around here know of (or knew of) Infobooth/Candi Day either before or after she retired.

Seeing what she looked liked was interesting for me and I'm sure others as well. Do we know VV's motivation ? I suspect I do but he never said anything about her or attacked her here since he was let back in. The posting of the pic certainly could have be done with no mal intent.

So, is VV's log-in and password working now or not ? If he cannot log in how would he know what the "terms and conditions" are ?

Or have you communicated with him in another way ?
 
Originally posted by slinkybender
Shit... and I thought Judge Crater was LeB.......
Nope. I'm Nasty Patty. Having reduced my weight from 270 lbs to 210 lbs during the past several months, I now have the stretchmarks to prove it.

Once I reach 190 lbs, I shall become Nicole O'Neil.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top