Whassup and Saint Bart,
I'm having difficulty understanding your positions of not revealing explicit details of a session on a open board.
Whassup, in your initial review of your west coast trip you stated that all three providers you have seen did BBBJ, DATY and french kissed. Are not these three things explicit details? You did not state whether the BJ's were TC. How can mentioning whether the BJ's were to completion be any more explicit then just saying that the three providers did in fact do BBBJ?
Are we then to assume that since you did not mention whether any three of the providers you saw did or did not do FS that you consider this an explicit detail? I'm sure that allot of guys would want to know before spending $600 for an hour of an escorts time whether she is FS or just mutual oral.
The matter of YMMV. Both Whassup and Saint Bart agree that allot of services you can receive from an escort are how you relate (YMMV) with each other. Would you not want to know what is ultimately available from each specific individual? Sort of a high water mark that you reach for. Knowing before hand what your date for the evening will and will not do is a great way of knowing afterward just how well you were thought of by the escort that you had just seen.
I'm not saying you use such knowledge to browbeat an escort into doing something for you that you know she has done for others, such as saying to her well you did it for so and so, why not me. I'm just saying that knowing before hand, and then if
you did or did not receive such services is a great way of knowing if the escort and you related on a higher level.
I'm just saying that you should have some level of consistence on the matter of reporting explicit details. Saying that a provider did BBBJ, DATY and allowed french kissing are explicit details, unless of course you are a follower of the Slick Willy school of law, where a BJ is not considered sex. You mentioned a price (money) paid for a sex act, a BJ. What difference does it make whether you admitted whether the BJ was TC or not?
All details or no details. If you decide it's no details at all, what's the use of having such sites as UG and others?
I'm having difficulty understanding your positions of not revealing explicit details of a session on a open board.
Whassup, in your initial review of your west coast trip you stated that all three providers you have seen did BBBJ, DATY and french kissed. Are not these three things explicit details? You did not state whether the BJ's were TC. How can mentioning whether the BJ's were to completion be any more explicit then just saying that the three providers did in fact do BBBJ?
Are we then to assume that since you did not mention whether any three of the providers you saw did or did not do FS that you consider this an explicit detail? I'm sure that allot of guys would want to know before spending $600 for an hour of an escorts time whether she is FS or just mutual oral.
The matter of YMMV. Both Whassup and Saint Bart agree that allot of services you can receive from an escort are how you relate (YMMV) with each other. Would you not want to know what is ultimately available from each specific individual? Sort of a high water mark that you reach for. Knowing before hand what your date for the evening will and will not do is a great way of knowing afterward just how well you were thought of by the escort that you had just seen.
I'm not saying you use such knowledge to browbeat an escort into doing something for you that you know she has done for others, such as saying to her well you did it for so and so, why not me. I'm just saying that knowing before hand, and then if
you did or did not receive such services is a great way of knowing if the escort and you related on a higher level.
I'm just saying that you should have some level of consistence on the matter of reporting explicit details. Saying that a provider did BBBJ, DATY and allowed french kissing are explicit details, unless of course you are a follower of the Slick Willy school of law, where a BJ is not considered sex. You mentioned a price (money) paid for a sex act, a BJ. What difference does it make whether you admitted whether the BJ was TC or not?
All details or no details. If you decide it's no details at all, what's the use of having such sites as UG and others?
