Dream come true, or ... nightmare?

Status
Not open for further replies.
To Sleep Perchance To Dream?

Originally posted by donquixote04
by donQuixote04

I don't know if it will end up as a dream come true or my worst nightmare.
I just recently came across this thread and had the opportunity to read your story.

My perspective may be a little different than many of the other people who commented because I had the opportunity to read not only the entire story but about your activities afterward.

My first question is, are you sure you know what you’re looking for. The sense that I got reading your story is that you were not satisfied with your marriage, met Lisa, and came to conclude that a permanent (nominally) monogamous relationship with her, probably in the form of marriage, would be much more fulfilling than your current marriage. Certainly the way in which you discussed taking the next step with her (children, etc.) seemed to imply this.

That may or may not have been the case. You probably will never know. Lisa is gone. The real problem is that the needs that you attempted to fulfill through the a relationship with Lisa remain.

I do not agree with some of the other posters who suggested that you focus on doing what is necessary to make your relationship with your current wife into what you would like it to be. That may not be possible. I think coming to some conclusion about this is really the first thing you need to do.

Based on some of the things you have said in your story, and what you have and have not said in response to posters who made this suggestion, I think you have in fact have made a decision concerning this. But since you have not expressed a conclusion one-way or the other it is possible that you have made a decision, but not acknowledged it.

If you conclude that it is possible, and that you want to try, then that’s what you should do. My own experience is that while it is possible to have a very good relationship with your wife and still see providers, that seeing providers when you are attempting to improve your relationship with your wife is probably not such a good idea.

If you conclude that it is not possible to get what you want out of your current marriage you face a series of questions;

Are you willing to end your marriage with your current wife?

If no, and you still are interested in having a relationship like the one you had with Lisa, it probably would be better if you attempt to have this relationship with someone who themselves does not wish to marry, you need to think through how this relationship would work, given that you are going to remain married, and as the relationship evolves with this new person you need to think about, and talk about, the relationship becoming closer in ways that do not imply marriage. (Here is a depressing thought – you really don’t want to leave your marriage, you do want to pursue the fulfillment of your needs through a relationship with someone else, that is what Lisa wanted as well, so you actually had what you wanted, but it was the marriage part that spooked her.)

Alternatively you may decide that either because of some aspect of your relationship with your wife, or it does not seem to be possible to have the experience you want with a women unless you are married to her, you need to acknowledge to yourself that you are planning on getting divorced and remarried.

Having reached that point the only remaining problem is finding this new woman. Oh, and there is the issue of what you do with your current wife while you are looking. Here there are basically two alternatives; tell her or don’t tell her. There are advantages and disadvantages to each alternative, and particularly if you tell her, variations in exactly what it means for your day-to-day life.

Obviously telling her, separating, beginning the process of getting divorced is both “the right thing to do” and also more likely to enable you to develop a relationship with another women who wants to get married. But it also involves more risk if in fact, while you would prefer a better relationship with someone else, you prefer your relationship with your wife to none at all.

Once you have gone through this decision making process you will have a much better idea of what you are looking for, a wife or a consort. And knowing what you are looking for is always a big help in finding it.

While there are a number of characteristics that might be found in providers that might make them attractive to you as a wife, there are interesting, sexy, vibrant women engaged in a wide variety of professions. It seems that your search has primarily focused on providers and you might want to expand your search to include non-providers as well. This may even be the case if you decide to opt for the consort solution rather than the marriage solution.

This throwing your life up in the air and changing everything stuff is quite “challenging”. I don’t recommend doing it too often, so the more sure you are that you have considered all the possibilities before choosing one the better the chance that you won’t have to do it too soon. (Choosing one, and the necessity of doing so have always been issues for me – but that’s not necessarily relevant to you.)

My sense is you are grappling with a number of related but really quite separate issues and decisions. Recognizing these and thinking about them before you get very involved in a new relationship may enable you to achieve a better result. Or at least have a better idea of why, the next time you “fall” in love based on chemistry and sex, if it becomes a nightmare rather than a dream, why that might have been the case.
(Keep in mind that without dreams there are no nightmares, but it is the nightmare that makes the dream a dream.)

One final comment and you can take it for what its worth. The contentment and fulfillment that you are looking for is within you, so don’t be surprised when it isn’t in any relationship in which you might get involved..

Which isn’t to say that women don’t have a lot to offer, and can’t help you find what you already have.
 
After you have bumped into the furniture enough you begin to know where things are even if you are blind.

Besides - other people's problems are always easier than your own.

If you really need help my electronic correspondence button is turned on. In explaining it to me you will figure it out.

Alternatively, wait a while - things will change.
 
Re: Getting over Lisa and getting on with my life

I read the whole thread for the first time an hour ago. Uhh, no, not a nightmare. No pregnancy, no STD, no divorce, no pauperization. Memorable sex at bargain rates. A person whose life is so together that he's feeling smothered by the structure has a splendid romance with a person whose life is so chaotic that she must keep track of numerous aliases, birthdays, and invented relatives.

Early on, DQ chooses to avoid discussing remuneration, it seems to me, as a wee test, to see what Amy/Lisa "is." If she brings it up, she is a prostitute, and he can feel comfortable giving her scripts without worrying about her head (yay), but it'll cost him (boo). If she doesn't, then she is a girlfriend, and he gets to have sex for less (yay), he can simply not think about how she's covering her expenses since her income has dropped (yay), but he has to worry about her head (boo). In my experience, secret relationship testing is for the birds, there's no such thing as "a prostitute", and there's no such thing as "a girlfriend." There's only someone much like yourself who is coping with the baffling world with a gawdawful mix of skill and clumsiness. (In the absence of pathology.)

DQ wants more sex than he is getting from his legitimate partner, Mrs. Q. Abram had a similar difficulty with Sara, who, being a good sport, offered him a surrogate. DQ figures he can skip the awkward conversations with Mrs. Q - 'I am going bonkers here, my beloved fudgsicle, do I have to visit brothels?' - by arranging the surrogate himself, but this means he needs to pile up the fibs, and DQ sucks at the chaos thing.

The evidence suggests to me that DQ try coming to terms with his libido by another route. I have trouble imagining him saying "I need to get my nuts cracked twice a week, and I don't consider that infidelity," and if he can't say that, he shouldn't shop at the nutcracker store. The region abounds with alternatives, and an Ivy-Techy could put together quite a list. Maybe an over-the-knee spanking from Jackie Parks, while he bemoans his broken heart and she tells him stories of Warner Bros. Maybe one of those amazing three-hour ceremonies with a tantrica that feels like it lasts twelve months. Maybe hire an escort and use the time-and-companionship for dancing at a club. But I think he should try something, so he doesn't get all sour inside, because that would be a shame.
 
Last edited:
Cheerful, thank you for your addition to my collection of memorable quotes:

"I need to get my nuts cracked twice a week, and I don't consider that infidelity," and if he can't say that, he shouldn't shop at the nutcracker store.
 
to justme

Originally posted by justme
I think, DQ, had you found an experience that was even a small part as satisfying as what you had with Lisa, that you would have been a little less human than your posts in this thread have led me to believe you were. ...
Thank you, justme, for these very kind words.
 
to budyyy

Originally posted by buddyyy
... My first question is, are you sure you know what you’re looking for. ...
Of course I don't. When I met Lisa, I was hobbying as a mechanism to maintain my marriage, which sucks sexually, but which is good in other respects.




Originally posted by buddyyy
... The sense that I got reading your story is that you were not satisfied with your marriage, met Lisa, and came to conclude that a permanent (nominally) monogamous relationship with her, probably in the form of marriage, would be much more fulfilling than your current marriage. ...
This is a little too strongly worded, I think. I was certainly hoping to start a process with Lisa to figure out whether we could be as compatible outside of sex as we obviously were sexually. We both knew that if there was to be a future for us we had to like each other deeply, and we both knew that we had a ways to go before we could figure that out.




Originally posted by buddyyy
... I do not agree with some of the other posters who suggested that you focus on doing what is necessary to make your relationship with your current wife into what you would like it to be. That may not be possible. I think coming to some conclusion about this is really the first thing you need to do. ...
I'm hoping that counseling will help me get to some conclusion about this. Having never gone through that process, I don't really know what to expect. The current plan is to bring the topic up in September, when our youngest goes off to college. In the meantime, I've been focussing on keeping things as pleasant as possible.




Originally posted by buddyyy
... Here is a depressing thought – you really don’t want to leave your marriage, you do want to pursue the fulfillment of your needs through a relationship with someone else, that is what Lisa wanted as well, so you actually had what you wanted, but it was the marriage part that spooked her. ...
You may be right about this. I was, however, working under the severe disadvantage of believing what Lisa told me. When her story changed, I believed the latest version. Lisa told me she was unhappily married, childless, 35 years old, and interested in having children "some day." Given that I was accepting that these "facts" were true, I think it was natural to conclude that the only way to envision a permanent relationship with Lisa would be to envision marriage.




Originally posted by buddyyy
... While there are a number of characteristics that might be found in providers that might make them attractive to you as a wife, there are interesting, sexy, vibrant women engaged in a wide variety of professions. It seems that your search has primarily focused on providers and you might want to expand your search to include non-providers as well. ...
Well, let's keep in mind that there has been no "search" up to now at all. I wasn't meeting providers with the idea of auditioning them for a permanent starring role in my life. My relationship with Lisa certainly developed (many would say "got out of hand") much further than just a hobbyist and provider, but that's all it was when we first met.
 
to cheerful

Originally posted by Cheerful
... I have trouble imagining him saying "I need to get my nuts cracked twice a week, and I don't consider that infidelity," and if he can't say that, he shouldn't shop at the nutcracker store. ...
As Paulus said, this is a great line. But clarify this for me: are you really suggesting, as it seems to me that you are, that all married hobbyists who believe hobbying constitutes infidelity should stop hobbying? If married hobbyists were to take this advice, I suspect that providers' business would probably be cut in half.




Originally posted by Cheerful
... Maybe an over-the-knee spanking from Jackie Parks, while he bemoans his broken heart and she tells him stories of Warner Bros. Maybe one of those amazing three-hour ceremonies with a tantrica that feels like it lasts twelve months. Maybe hire an escort and use the time-and-companionship for dancing at a club. ...
I'm confused about this advice. I don't know who Jackie Parks is, but I have no interest in pain. I similarly have no interest in "tantric" providers - this has always sounded like so much new age b.s. to me. And time-and-companionship? My wife is terrific at that. It's sex that's lacking, not time and companionship.

In the course of my efforts to fill the sex deficiency in my life, I met someone who seemed to offer the possibility of 100% of a relationship. Then, she reacted to my apparent lack of realism (by feeding me lines), making me think it might be possible to change both our lives in a way that would fulfill both of us. It wasn't until her disappearing act that I realized I was dreaming.
 
Re: to budyyy

Originally posted by donquixote04

Well, let's keep in mind that there has been no "search" up to now at all. I wasn't meeting providers with the idea of auditioning them for a permanent starring role in my life.
Are you sure? Once you met Lisa and found/thought she was/ could be what you were looking for...and she was a provider, when you meet new providers now, not all of them, but with the special ones, don't you think about/ wonder if she could be the one. Do you ever meet none providers and think about them in the same way?

I think that, perhaps, you will be able to look back after a while and recognize that you were in fact looking...for something ...before you met Lisa. You just didn't realize it at the time.
 
Last edited:
Re: to cheerful

Originally posted by donquixote04
But clarify this for me: are you really suggesting, as it seems to me that you are, that all married hobbyists who believe hobbying constitutes infidelity should stop hobbying?
Or stop being married.

If married hobbyists were to take this advice, I suspect that providers' business would probably be cut in half.
There might be a brief dip while the sexually miserable renegotiated with their marital partners.

I have no interest in pain.
Maybe not pain, but geez, people can eroticize all kinds of improbable sensations. Maybe you have a guilt fetish?

I similarly have no interest in ...
Right, I can't make your list, I can only point out that a Tech-Ivy dude is perfectly capable of making his own list, and suggest that it is dopey for him to restrict himself to things he's already tried and found flawed.

... feeding me lines ...
... while you fed lines to your marital partner about what exactly you were doing on your weekends and business trips, and pondered producing additional heirs to dilute her children's legacy. Gimme a break.
 
Last edited:

Hotpuppy

Mr.Butterworth
Re: to cheerful

Originally posted by donquixote04
I similarly have no interest in "tantric" providers - this has always sounded like so much new age b.s. to me.
Actually Tantric sexual practices have been around a lot longer than the "new age". When performed by a skilled woman( Cindy Spice in Las Vegas or Elle in San Francisco), it can be quite an intense and enjoyable experience. Just as an aside dq, the two I mentioned are pros that wont take your heart and mind on a wild goose chase, but rather will make you feel wonderful during the time you purchase.
take care
HP
 
to buddyyy

Originally posted by buddyyy
Are you sure? Once you met Lisa and found/thought she was/ could be what you were looking for...and she was a provider, when you meet new providers now, not all of them, but with the special ones, don't you think about/ wonder if she could be the one. Do you ever meet none providers and think about them in the same way? ...
I am sure about this. Nice theory, buddyyy, but you are wrong about this. I haven't even begun to imagine "she might be the one" with any provider I have met since. Or with any provider I met prior to Lisa. I was always pleased to meet a provider with the idea that my sexual needs might be met for a price, and how terrific it is that this could be accomplished without risking my relationship with my wife.

Originally posted by buddyyy
... I think that, perhaps, you will be able to look back after a while and recognize that you were in fact looking...for something ...before you met Lisa. You just didn't realize it at the time.
This might be true for someone else, but you are just off base on this as it pertains to me. Lisa has been absolutely unique in this regard.
 
to cheerful

Originally posted by cheerful
... I have trouble imagining him saying "I need to get my nuts cracked twice a week, and I don't consider that infidelity," and if he can't say that, he shouldn't shop at the nutcracker store. ...
Originally posted by donquixote04
... are you really suggesting, as it seems to me that you are, that all married hobbyists who believe hobbying constitutes infidelity should stop hobbying? ...
Originally posted by cheerful
... Or stop being married. ...
If the basis for your advice to me is founded on the assumption that marital fidelity should be a moral absolute, never to be violated, then I'll just look for my advice somewhere else, from someone less judgmental.




Originally posted by cheerful
... while you fed lines to your marital partner about what exactly you were doing on your weekends and business trips, and pondered producing additional heirs to dilute her children's legacy. Gimme a break. ...
You can rest assured that my children have been, are, and will be very well taken care of, regardless of whether I ever end up with more kids. I don't need you or anyone else, knowing nothing about me and my family, making ad hominem attacks about my ability and/or willingness to be a responsible dad. "Gimme a break" indeed!
 
Re: to cheerful

Originally posted by donquixote04
You can rest assured that my children have been, are, and will be very well taken care of, regardless of whether I ever end up with more kids. I don't need you or anyone else, knowing nothing about me and my family, making ad hominem attacks about my ability and/or willingness to be a responsible dad. "Gimme a break" indeed!
"Well taken care of" in your opinion, in the opinion of you and your wife, or in the grand joined opinion of you, your wife, and your kids? I mean, DQ -- look at medieval English history! People go to war over inheritances, not the old slip-and-slide. You're playin' with flamethrowers, and I'm simply bringing it to your attention.

With respect to "fidelity is an absolute," what a lovely strawman. Joe witnessed falsely when he told pharoah that his wife was his sister, and his justification appears to be that it was better to fib than to be put to death. The reaper isn't going to come knocking at a guy's door any earlier simply because he's decided that he's keeping his pants zipped until he's come to terms with strict monogamy (does whacking off to adult movies count? what if you stop before you ejaculate?) and fidelity (forsaking all others).

Someone who feels guilty about having sex with a commercial partner should stop doing it, unless the guilty feeling is the whole point. Someone who doesn't feel guilty about it either (1) thinks it's not an infidelity or (2) thinks fidelity is no big deal.

Or (3) drinks enough that the memory is but a dreamlike work of fiction :)
 
Last edited:

justme

homo economicus
The notion that we should abstain from that which brings us guilt is so deeply flawed that it hardly seems worth refuting.

But for fun, let's point out that in a battle of conflicted emotions, no one is absolutely correct.

Let's also point out that guilt is often based in socialization that is disjoint from an individuals own ethics. Or that perhaps the individual's ethics are not internally consistant.

While I agree with the notion that DQ should either stop seeing prostitutes or tell his wife that he's seeing them, I certainly don't see how anyone could assume such an incredibly arrogant tone of self-righteousness.
 
to cheerful

Originally posted by Cheerful
... DQ figures he can skip the awkward conversations with Mrs. Q - 'I am going bonkers here, my beloved fudgsicle, do I have to visit brothels?' - by arranging the surrogate himself, but this means he needs to pile up the fibs, and DQ sucks at the chaos thing. ...
If, by the "chaos thing" you mean I am lousy at covering my tracks, then I think this is another instance in which you've gotten it wrong. There are lots of things I suck at, but covering my tracks isn't really one of them.
 
to cheerful

Originally posted by Cheerful
"Well taken care of" in your opinion, in the opinion of you and your wife, or in the grand joined opinion of you, your wife, and your kids? I mean, DQ -- look at medieval English history! People go to war over inheritances, not the old slip-and-slide. You're playin' with flamethrowers, and I'm simply bringing it to your attention. ...
Well thanks for your kindness in bring this to my attention. For the second time, I ask you to relax about this aspect of my personal family life. Since I am not a character in "Lion in Winter," my son is not named Richard the Lionhearted, and I am not a member of the medieval English Royalty, I am comfortable I can avoid a civil war in the event of additional Quixote04 issue. I don't think I need to explain to you the actual or likely opinions of me, my wife, or my children to be justified in asking you to chill on this topic.




Originally posted by Cheerful
... With respect to "fidelity is an absolute," what a lovely strawman. ... Someone who feels guilty about having sex with a commercial partner should stop doing it, unless the guilty feeling is the whole point. ...
What has led you to believe I feel guilty about my hobby activities?




Originally posted by Cheerful
... Someone who doesn't feel guilty about it either (1) thinks it's not an infidelity or (2) thinks fidelity is no big deal. Or (3) drinks enough that the memory is but a dreamlike work of fiction :)
I guess you'll have to count me in category (2). I certainly believe this hobby counts as infidelity and I avoid chemicals that cloud the mind.

I suppose that makes me a "recreationalist." How about you? Are you a "traditionalist" or a "relationalist?"

(from http://www.utopiaguide.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=7314 )
Originally posted by Cheerful
... In Sex in America: A Definitive Survey, the authors distinguish three different Americans beliefs with respect to the proper boundaries for sex:

Traditionalists, who hold that proper sex occurs only within marriage between one man and one woman.

Relationalists, who hold that sex is proper if the participants are in a caring relationship, so pre-marital sex, living together, Playboy's How to Make Love to the Same Person Forever, and those nice gay couples are all O.K.

Recreationalists, who hold that sex is proper if it is diverting. Each group claims roughly a third of the population. ...
 
Last edited:
Re: to cheerful

Originally posted by donquixote04



If the basis for your advice to me is founded on the assumption that marital fidelity should be a moral absolute, never to be violated, then I'll just look for my advice somewhere else, from someone less judgmental.
This is the second funniest thing I've read here so far!!!!!
 
Re: Re: to cheerful

Originally posted by Cheerful
and pondered producing additional heirs to dilute her children's legacy. Gimme a break.
No more kids for me and my wife . . . I wouldn't want to dilute my existing kids' legacy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top