CL girls and reviews

How many photos does a CL girl have to send out

  • 1

    Votes: 57 51.8%
  • 25

    Votes: 35 31.8%
  • 100

    Votes: 6 5.5%
  • 500

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1000

    Votes: 4 3.6%
  • Never

    Votes: 8 7.3%

  • Total voters
    110
Status
Not open for further replies.
#22
Re: Re: Re: Re: a simple question from the little vampire

Originally posted by TheRedDragon
Wow. Talk about fluffing. Looks like Slinky's getting his dick sucked right here.
I wrote that????? Damn......must have been channeling hvb again.....

OUT! OUT! evil spirit! :D
 

Slinky Bender

The All Powerful Moderator
#23
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a simple question from the little vampire

Originally posted by TheRedDragon
Meanwhile, why are we still debating this stupid issue? If someone -- ANYONE -- sends you a picture of themselves in confidence, you should NOT show it to anyone else without that person's permission.
Is it the reading, or the reading comprehension part you failed?

(oh, wait.... it's the agenda part....)
 

Slinky Bender

The All Powerful Moderator
#24
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a simple question from the little vampire

Originally posted by jseah
Maybe they need to put a disclaimer at the end of their *****s.....like the website disclaimers that the fee is for companionship only and anything else that happens is between consenting adults.....
Sure, why not? It would be just as meaningful. Just like when the parking ticket, coat check ticket, etc. says "Not respsonible, etc."... that holds up too.................... NOT.

You often see idiots posting asking about "what if the provider sells you something, and the sex "just happens".. would it be legal then? But I understand why these people thing this way: they always opperate under the assumption that everyone else is as stupid as they are. So, when the case goes to the jury, they think the jury would all think "Yeah that makes sense; this 23 year old with 3 priors for prosititution decided to sell $3 spoons for $250, and she met this guy who bought one, and she found the 5'7", 250lbs, smelly fat fuck so attractive that she just decided to fuck him because she was so attracted to him sexually". Sure.... it happens all the time.
 
#26
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a simple question from the little vampire

Originally posted by slinkybender
Sure, why not? It would be just as meaningful. Just like when the parking ticket, coat check ticket, etc. says "Not respsonible, etc."... that holds up too.................... NOT.
So I forgot the SFSF.........so sue me.......

I WAS JOKING
 

Slinky Bender

The All Powerful Moderator
#27
OK, some guys are going to get pissed but this just has to be said:

If any girls: CL girls, non-CL girls, etc. think that guys are not going to be passing around their photos that they have gotten,

THEN THEY ARE OUT OF THEIR FUCKING MINDS.

I don't know whether it bothers me more that the girls are so stupid as to believe it isn't happening, or the guys comming here pretending that they don't do it because "it's wrong" while they are in the middle of doing it. There are two types of guys in this thread: the ones who admit to having passed around girl's photos, and the liars.

If someone/anyone want to have discussions about whether websites should facilitate this or not, that's a different issue and THAT'S NOT WHAT THIS THREAD IS ABOUT, so if you even want to discuss that issue, start another thread (yes, that's another warning).
 

Slinky Bender

The All Powerful Moderator
#28
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a simple question from the little vampire

Originally posted by jseah
So I forgot the SFSF.........so sue me.......

I WAS JOKING
I know you were.......... I was amplifying, not contradicting.

PS Never say "so sue me" to me. I have a stack of Blue Backs pre-printed with "Slinybender vs Your-name-here".
 

TheRedDragon

BLT about to become toast
#29
a-holes and liars

Slink,

You're right, buddy. CL hookers, ALL hookers ... should be careful. A lot of a-holes out there. Big time. Type of guys who would take advantage. Pass a girl's picture around. Tell his pals all about her. Even share the info with strangers.

Real a-holes. And any guy who doesn't cop to not doing it is just a liar.

One question, though: which are you?

RD
 

Escort_King

Some day I will learn to post ISO's in the proper
#32
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a simple question from the little vampire

Originally posted by slinkybender
Sure, why not? It would be just as meaningful. Just like when the parking ticket, coat check ticket, etc. says "Not respsonible, etc."... that holds up too.................... NOT.

You often see idiots posting asking about "what if the provider sells you something, and the sex "just happens".. would it be legal then? But I understand why these people thing this way: they always opperate under the assumption that everyone else is as stupid as they are. So, when the case goes to the jury, they think the jury would all think "Yeah that makes sense; this 23 year old with 3 priors for prosititution decided to sell $3 spoons for $250, and she met this guy who bought one, and she found the 5'7", 250lbs, smelly fat fuck so attractive that she just decided to fuck him because she was so attracted to him sexually". Sure.... it happens all the time.
I still have the spoons... needed a dozen for a set....
 
#33
Originally posted by slinkybender
PS how would you like to get treated by LE if you were coaght breaking the law? Does that mean you believe that's the way everyone who breaks the law should get treated by LE? I highly doubt it.
Were that ever to happen what I would expect is to be treated like anyone else. What I would work from that point outward is entirely another matter.

Not only does that expectation give me a firm grasp on potential threat levels, it provides for the greatest possiblity for working around them.

One of the benefits of never taking things for granted is never tricking yourself into the notion that you are on firmer ground then you actually are.
 
#34
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: a simple question from the little vampire

Originally posted by TheRedDragon
Can't one of the goddamned lawyers on this board clear up the legal issue here, as well? A personally addressed communication, such as an ***** or letter, is intended for the recipient only ....

Christ Almighty.
You have limited understanding of the internet and how it works, and the applicable laws given that nature of how it works.

****** is not a person to person form of communication, like the telephone or the U.S. mail. Each and every server that ****** passes through can, and frequently does, maintain a copy of same for at least some period of time. There are logs showing its comings and goings. Any of which are easily seen by a host of individuals who do all manner of administrative tasks, and sometimes just anyone who chooses to log in and take a look.

This is, specifically, why ****** encryption is such a hot topic. Its the only way to assure any level of privacy in ******.

Because ****** works the way it does civil courts do not place the same level of privacy on ****** that they attach to other forms of communication. Criminal courts still maintain that a warrant is required in most situations, except that where a claim of terrorist activity is made and then the Patriot Act [which seriously needs to go away] kicks in.
 
#36
Originally posted by xxx_xoxo
the application of law in the outlaw territory of whoreboarding seems a little dubious. might take the fun out of the whole thing ;-)
Ah, but just like the Wild West, eventually this territory will be tamed and placed under the rule of law. It is inevitable, though not desirable.
 
#38
Originally posted by slinkybender

this issue is not whter girls who send out photos should have their photos posted; the question is about discussing/reviewing girls who have sent out their photos, and at what point do they become "ripe" for discussion). [/B]
If that's the case, perhaps the question should focus on the number of ads responded to rather than photos.

A few weeks ago I received a series of hasty, generic, "cut-and-paste" responses from a woman who seemed to operating in a high-volume mode. Of all the women who have responded to my ads, this one clearly had the least "reasonable expectation of privacy".

But she never sent out a photo - not even when I wrote back and asked her for one.
 

justme

homo economicus
#39
I agree that what's important is the manner in which she conducts her business.

I think someone even said that somewhere up above.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top