candide and her plea to mr pitiful......

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1
A Plea to Mr. Pitiful

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JAG Member Discussion Board: General Discussion: A Plea to Mr. Pitiful
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By LeBeguine on Wednesday, August 28, 2002 - 11:43 am:


John's Action Guide, PC


somewhere out there


cyberspace, god's good universe


60609



MEMO


Thursday, August 29, 2002

To: Mr. Pitiful
From: Le Beguine
Re: Health and Well Being of the JAG Community

Issue
I have been asked to discuss the future of this
whoreboard with respect to the quantity and quality of its
postings. Clearly, there has been some diminution since
its inception, 6 years ago, and its zenith, about 2.

Question
How can we maintain the quality and integrity of JAG?

Facts
Over the course of the past couple of years, there has
been apparent and unapparent: (i) infighting among
members, (ii) wresting of control from others, (iii)
disputes over postings by a certain Candi, (iv)
disagreements regarding a whore named Inna et al.
and the other types of vicissitudes and infelicities
normally experienced by any group of human beans with
common interests or genetics. Moreover, Aristotle ("Ari")
has seems to have taken a powder; Social Register ("SR")
is currently dating Mike Ovitz's x chromosome; and
Hombre Secreto ("HS") is suffering from noncompos
mentis sexualis. MM has his hands full keeping the darned
thing running at all (atomically speaking).

Analysis
Clearly, there are several remedies available which can
rectify this situation:

1. Sniping must stop.
2. Mano a mano for control must cease.
3. An understanding that Candi no longer posts or
provides must be achieved.
4. An agreement that the provider/hobbyist relationship
is transactional must be acknowledged.
5. Full participation from Ari, SR and HS is required.

And the final, and perhaps, most important part of the
solution: Mr. Pitiful must return to post and riposte.
Additionally, other members/different posters and
reviewers would buttress the health of the site. If these
steps are not taken, post haste, I cannot, and would not,
assure the client that JAG would retain its ineffable
quality which places it head and shoulders above the rest.

Conclusion
Play hard. Play nice.

retained,
B, esq.

p.s. any sandwiches left in conference room C?
dis-associated,
B.
By JohnnyK on Wednesday, August 28, 2002 - 12:35 pm:


I suggest you post this on UG (where he will see it, perhaps you should change the thread title to a Plea to justlooking), however brace yourself for quite a ride if you do. (say Hi to Rufus and The Ghost of JAG for me)

I will add that Mr.P didnt leave for the reasons you stated- unfortunatelty the thread that led to his demise is no longer here.

By LeBeguine on Wednesday, August 28, 2002 - 02:43 pm:


jk:

i have virtually never been upon, nor, certainly,
never posted upon on another board (whore or
otherwise). i trust that word will reach him. i'm
not worried by the ride as i have trained with the
best and the worst, and i think he has only
trained with the best. i have no real idea why he
left, but would be more than happy to discuss why
with him (individual or in group), if he chooses
to return.

veritas,
B

By Clinton Lawyer on Wednesday, August 28, 2002 - 06:09 pm:


She meant, this persona has never been on another whoreboard.

By Mopar on Wednesday, August 28, 2002 - 06:10 pm:


Human Beans?

By Phoenix on Wednesday, August 28, 2002 - 08:17 pm:


Yes. Human Beans. Let me expound. The bean stems (no pun intended) from the genus Phaseolus in the pea family. So in Leb's reference she's making a reference to the similarities of the term "Phallus". The bean can also be from any of various edible seeds of plants of the family "Leguminosae". Do you notice any resemblance between "Leguminosae" and "Lebeguine"? Okay...that last one was a stretch.

By LeBeguine on Wednesday, August 28, 2002 - 11:45 pm:


clinton lawyer:

suck my $40 corona grande, this person(a)
has
never posted elsewhere. (unless you count
reading
brideshead and gatsby boards ... then so be
it).
if you care to go head to head, poorly
constructed sentence to poorly constructed
sentence: let the games begin.

wouldn't do your boss, wouldn't do his wife,
would let chelsea have it DEEP with my best
extra thick double dildo. went to school with
your boss's communications adviser, been
sucking HIS dick lately or maybe you're still on
George S's?

democracy, now --
B.
 
#2
"i have virtually never been upon, nor, certainly,
never posted upon on another board (whore or
otherwise). "



ok.... so how did she find jag then? and how does she know if "mr pitiful" even still exists?


"I will add that Mr.P didnt leave for the reasons you stated- unfortunatelty the thread that led to his demise is no longer here."

how would a supposed brand new jag member know any of this?
 
#4
GG....

LeB is a woman who claims to be a client.... however i and many others seem to believe that she is the once candide. a former prostitute turned fake client on jag (infobooth). the same person rumored to have total access and perhaps be board op staff as well, on a board that is supposed to be prostitute free (clients only).


she has infultrated jag (at least the management claims so) posing as a client. but this is a jag tactict.,.... it has ong been rumored that they use jag staff to post as "john b" a popular poster who constantly shills for julies and posts reviews for most if not all of her newest girls... and in a lot of cases it seems that he is privy to certain extra services that others have not been privy to at julies (from certain girls).
 
#6
By LeBeguine on Wednesday, August 28, 2002 - 11:49 pm:


p.s. those in subpar firms shouldn't throw
stones.

by the b,
Beguine

By Pat McGroyne on Thursday, August 29, 2002 - 12:53 am:


LeB,

Be careful what you wish for in trying to get Mr.P to come back to JAG. I shudder to think what he would say to some of the more obscure posts and threads initiated by you!

Just joking, but P pretty much told it like it was. Just a friendly warning.

Pat, who would be VERY glad to see Mr. Pitiful on this board again.

By LeBeguine on Thursday, August 29, 2002 - 06:43 am:


dear pmc you little warmongering right wing
fascist (and i say that with the utmost love):

re: mr. p.

if mr. p cannot follow ... more fool he. nearly
every one of my posts is cogent and logical,
one
merely needs the context, and even then, only
a
modicum of effort is required to parse or
research the context. however, if p's
commentary
is fair and constructively critical (and does not
come, as it so often does, from a bruised
male
ego), i will worship him.

furthermore, not only would i learn a little
sumpin' sumpin' from mr. p., he might learn a
little sumpin' from B who could have been an
underling (had she chosen the paranoid
nightmare
of that risk-averse and ever-decaying route).
law
in the year 2002 is the reddest of red stars ...
it's ... dying, dying egypt.

i thought perhaps clinton lawyer might be he
(and
never having read any of p's work, i couldn't
compare the style). i should hope that mr. p is
more discriminating than cl who clearly, like
his
boss, leaps b/f he looks. poor president c --
mind of derrida, impulse control of ted bundy.

it is nice to be intelligent and well educated
... many good lawyers are ... but it is better to
be perceptive and astute, that's where the rain
falls (and the head remains off the block and
on
one's narrow, brooks brothers covered
shoulders).

pacifist former playah,
B





"i thought perhaps clinton lawyer might be he
(and
never having read any of p's work, i couldn't
compare the style). i should hope that mr. p is
more discriminating than cl who clearly, like
his
boss, leaps b/f he looks. poor president c --
mind of derrida, impulse control of ted bundy.



so now she claims never to have read P's work? funny... but she knows an awful lot.
 
#8
Hey Ozzy,

I read somewhere that LeB hoped that her posts were not being reposted on UG and she would be pretty upset about it.

I think you just gained a new friend or a old one?

(ok back to reading mood)
 
#10
Originally posted by jasonbuju
Hey Ozzy,

I read somewhere that LeB hoped that her posts were not being reposted on UG and she would be pretty upset about it.

I think you just gained a new friend or a old one?

(ok back to reading mood)

By LeBeguine on Thursday, September 05, 2002 - 09:23 pm:


dearest gardenstate:

r any of my posts on UG? that would make me very unhappy ... inclined even to stop posting.

tramps like us, baby
B.

although i've never seen it, ug sounds like ugh.
homo nym, homo phone, homo sapien, homogirl,
B.




yeah...... this ain't candide... and she's never read UG phuleeezze!


btw.. candide once posted on this board that i was stealing her creative writings (infobooths posts from jag) and demanded that i cease and desist.... do you see a trend here.
 
#12
outside a few discussion on "yours truly"... there is NOTHING there. my candide issue must be accounting for 80 to 90% of the total post count the last few days.
 
#14
JL....

it's the defensive stuff she's written (only) pertaining to candide (and NO other former or current prostitute who's pics were also posted in those threads) that leads many to believe she's candi. (i couldn't post it all there's so much (over a hundred posts))

when you read the rest of the threads perhaps your opinion will change.
 
#16
JL.....


assuming for a minute that you're right and that LeB is NOT candide.... from these posts.... could anyone dispute that "LeB" was created to help lure Mr P back to jag. it's certain that she's not being totally honest about never having read P's work or UG, yet knows so much about the turn of event over the last 18 months or so.


(i also think it's painfully obvious that "mr P" could probably tell in a minute after reading some of her posts) that "LeB" is a pseudo intellectual.... and i think thats what Pat Mc was attempting to point out to her)
 

Hotpuppy

Mr.Butterworth
#19
Boston! Feh!
We beat their pathetic and beloved Sox.
Now we've topped their nonsensical little TBD community as well.
New York Rules! ;)

I gotta get back to work.
hp
 
#20
Ozzy,
As someone who believes that you shouldnt have been banned recently, I would bet that LeB is NOT Candide.
Whether the pic posting was inapropriate is irregardless, others have done similar things and have not been treated as harshly. Take the pic down and warn everyone that pics of people no longer involved in the biz sould not be posted OR if someone requests it be taken down, so be it. Thus the "punishment" you recieved was out of line. (and I understand the argument MM tries to make, but he cant read your mind, he should have discussed it offline with you) I do recommend for your sanity and hers that you just leave each other alone.
That said.
Just as many of you have come to trust Thorn as someone who doesnt have an agenda and could be held to a good standard the same can be said of hombre secreto.
Hombre has posted that he has met both ladies and they are NOT the same person. Apparently they even spend some offline time together (LeB) and I would guess that she has gotten her JAG history from him. (I think this was even touched upon in a thread by him) Looking at her posts you can see her opinion is based on 2nd hand knowledge and I even corrected her in the post that follows.

"I will add that Mr.P didnt leave for the reasons you stated- unfortunatelty the thread that led to his demise is no longer here. "

AND I wasnt even around at the time myself and it's stuff that I went back and read thru here and JAG and know almost most of it. (yes, it took me a longer time, but if you look at her post times she's on quite a bit- she could rival your online time.)

Do I think she's a pain in the ass? Sometimes, but I could say the same thing about most every sex addict whoreboard poster (including myself).

Lastly,
She's seen evegirl, I wouldnt want to impose upon and have her break client confidence, but IF LeB gives her permission to do so, would that do it for you? (just confirm she is not Candide and nothing else)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top